Typically it's an inverse relationship between scratch resistance and drop resistance, so I am not surprised they didn't mention it.You'll notice Apple didn't say anything about scratch resistance.
Glass is glass and glass still breaks and scratches.
Why have they not gone to the Sapphire screen they put on the watches yet?
then you would have your “scratch resistance“
Because no one wants to pay that much for a phone.
Lol, exactly. Same here. Never had an issue without one.I've never once used a screen protector and I'm not about to start now.
I would pay “extra” for a phone with Sapphire instead of dealing with screen protectors and surface scratches.
Lol, exactly. Same here. Never had an issue without one.
apple tried to do that... invested billions in a company to make sapphire iPhone screens but the tech never worked and they couldn't make screens in any volume reliably so they ended having to part ways with the company who then went out of business. they doubled down with owens corning who has made nice jumps with the glass every year.
Not even once. Maybe I've just never owned a phone for long enough for that to happen? I've performed yearly upgrades since the 4S with the lone exception of skipping the iPhone 5.At the very least I would think your oleophobic protection would wear off then you're looking at a really fingerprinty screen, no?
I would pay “extra” for a phone with Sapphire instead of dealing with screen protectors and surface scratches.
You would, I wouldn't.
I'll stick to my $10 glass screen protectors that can easily be removed and replaced.
I would much rather not have to deal with a glass screen protector that gets “phantom chips” every so often or is slightly raised off the screen making the screen “not flush”.
maybe minor issues but still two annoyances with glass screen protectors that I face.
Exactly, the thing probably still scratches depending on the type of abrasive material might get in contact with itYou'll notice Apple didn't say anything about scratch resistance.