Hello,
I'm sure I'm not alone here, but I thought I'd see what your thoughts were on this.
Why is it that Apple hyped up the push notification service, and yet failed to approve IM+ or Beejive for the release date? I'm sure both developers submitted their apps within a reasonable time period, plus I would have thought that the priority in which these apps were to be approved would have been bumped up a notch, given their popularity and dependence upon the push notification service to become effective.
I, like everybody else was stuck to my iPhone for a few hours messing around with new features, yet the real feature that I was interested in was push and I'm still yet to try it out with something worth the time!
I do really feel for those on AT&T in the US though, it's not right being bound to a ridiculously lengthy and expensive contract to be told by Apple "And another thing... MMS. But sorry, for AT&T customers, MMS is at the bottom of this jar of barbed wire and salt" (FG reference).
Anyhow, that's my piece
I'm sure I'm not alone here, but I thought I'd see what your thoughts were on this.
Why is it that Apple hyped up the push notification service, and yet failed to approve IM+ or Beejive for the release date? I'm sure both developers submitted their apps within a reasonable time period, plus I would have thought that the priority in which these apps were to be approved would have been bumped up a notch, given their popularity and dependence upon the push notification service to become effective.
I, like everybody else was stuck to my iPhone for a few hours messing around with new features, yet the real feature that I was interested in was push and I'm still yet to try it out with something worth the time!
I do really feel for those on AT&T in the US though, it's not right being bound to a ridiculously lengthy and expensive contract to be told by Apple "And another thing... MMS. But sorry, for AT&T customers, MMS is at the bottom of this jar of barbed wire and salt" (FG reference).
Anyhow, that's my piece