The new Macbook is more like that 13" Macbook Pro we've always wanted. I'm happy about that, I've always wished they had a smaller "pro" model ever since the first Macbook Pro was introduced and the 12" powerbook was discontinued.
Other than that, this overhaul is good for Macbook but bad for MBP buyers.
In after FireWire.
The plastic MacBook line should have stayed on as the sub-$1,000 Macbook.
Just a thought: Are there any expresscard firewire adapters? Not as good as built in, but a solution none the less.
why do you need expresscard FW adapter? Macbook does not have an Expresscard slot
Haha, true. I forgot about that in the course of five minutes![]()
i guess it's just a matter of time till someone finds a hack to get some firewire in there. or apple see's the need to put firewire in the high end. then its a 13.3 inch MBP!
i might have bout it if it had a FW400 or better an Express card slot.
Maybe we can get an expresscard/pcmcia slot that connects to the MB using USB2.0, and then stick a FW 400 card in it.![]()
Uhh. Did that firewire over ethernet thing ever pan out?
I looked for an USB to FW converter but I guess due to the different nature of BUS, there are none..
Indeed. And since the 12" Powerbook was indeed a powerbook, not an iBook, I don't consider it the successor to anything but the iBook. Especially given the feature set.
Ever since the intel transition people have prattled on about the 12" PB like it was a smaller version of the 15" and 17". It's revisionist nonsense. The 12" powerbook was little more than an aluminum-clad ibook. Compared to the bigger powerbooks:
- slower processor
- inferior graphics (worse than the radeon 9550 that was on the last ibook, actually)
- no backlit keys
- no FW800
- lower max RAM capacity
- no express card slot (did the big PBs have that? I don't remember)
The current high end macbook as compared to the current MBP:
- slower processor
- inferior graphics
- no FW800
- no express card slot
--> but it does have backlit keys and equal RAM capacity
Bottom line is the new macbook is closer to the MBP than the 12" powerbook ever was to the 15" or 17" powerbooks.
I wanted a MBP and I held out for these, but I am POed that the base model lacks a back-lit keyboard because I was gonna saw to my friends that I had a MBP, heheOh well, might as well settle with what I'm gonna have!
![]()
The bigger powerbooks had a PCMCIA slot instead of the Expresscard slot. It was a bitch when it happened as no cards (that I would be using) were available in expresscard32 when it came out.
The 12" powerbook had a poor resolution by todays standards at 1024X768, but you're comparing it to a 15" powerbook with a resolution of 1280X854.
The 1.33GHz 12" PB had 64MBs of video ram, just like the 1.33GHz Powerbook, the 1.5GHz, and the 17" 1.5 GHz Powerbook.
It had the same 8X combo drive as the entry level 15 incher, and although backlight wasn't available on the 12" PB, it was merely an OPTION on the 15" 1.33ghz. Yes, an option.
Edit: Oh, I forgot to mention that I wholeheartedly disagree with your last claim. I think it's the reverse. The new MBPs are closer to a MB than ever. It's not a pro machine, but a 2008-version of a stripped iBook with some added disadvantages such as the glossy screen.
the new baseline Macbook Pro does NOT have a back lit keyboard??