max_altitude said:So much for those rumored plasma displays. 😛
I must say, I thought anything was possible from Apple, but this just seemed a bit too much.
maya said:For some far out reason I did not see this rumor being feasible. 😉
Never had much faith in that rumour...max_altitude said:So much for those rumored plasma displays. 😛
I must say, I thought anything was possible from Apple, but this just seemed a bit too much.
Anythings possible. How about giant LCD displays?~Shard~ said:I wouldn't count this rumor out of the mix just yet. Apple has updated its displays around this time of the year before, and not necessarily at MWSF, and the updates are definitely due for an update, so I could see this still coming true in some form at least in the near future.
~Shard~ said:I wouldn't count this rumor out of the mix just yet. Apple has updated its displays around this time of the year before, and not necessarily at MWSF, and the updates are definitely due for an update, so I could see this still coming true in some form at least in the near future.
max_altitude said:Anythings possible. How about giant LCD displays?
Mitthrawnuruodo said:Never had much faith in that rumour...
But you never know... maybe next year... 😉
maya said:LCD = Yes
Plasma = No
LCD/Plasma hybrid technology = Quite possible. 😉
A 42 inch screen is kinda big. 🙄
clayj said:It's hard to tell with Apple... plasmas with built-in computers would have been a huge revolutionary step, and just the sort of surprise that Jobs likes to pull on people.
But as I said in one of my posts, plasma TVs are NOT good computer monitors. The resolution isn't high enough and they suffer from burn-in far too easily. Also, the lifespan of a plasma TV will far exceed that of a personal computer... so you'd eventually end up with a plasma TV with antiquated computer parts inside it. Not a good idea. A separate computer module, linked to a big display, makes far more sense.
stevep said:I have to say that the guesses on what MWSF would bring were generally rubbish - a few people put their heads on the block to predict an Intel PowerBook replacement and met with lots of reasons why not. I don't recall reading a single post predicting an iMac replacement (I'm sure someone will correct me if I'm wrong!).
But plenty of 'very informed' reasoning why we should expect updated Minis and iBooks, and in the final moments that wild plasma thing. All of which were wrong. So far.
Thanks - perhaps I should have a look at their site now, as there still seems to be some wild speculation and very heated postings on MacRumors about what they have released and what people think is about to be released!devman said:I'm sure it was posted here somewhere, but back in mid-November Appleinsider did come out and say that the iMac and Powerbook would be the first Intel Macs and that the Mini and iBooks would go later. http://www.appleinsider.com/article.php?id=1368