I
iFanboy
Guest
Original poster
I was a chrome skeptic initially, but now at version 5 it's become my default on OSX.
Personally, I find it faster, more responsive, and seemingly "smoother" than safari. That's not to say Safari is the anthesis of that, it's handles much better than Firefox, but it's not *quite* as snappy or smooth as Chrome IMHO.
Oh, and it's extensions are getting better.
Firefox has really lost it's way since the days that it slayed IE. It's not bad really, it's just now that it's a measurable margin behind Safari and Chrome in pretty much everything I can think of.
Oh, and it's HTML5 h.264 boycott is killing it for me. I'm sorry, but h.264 is not the same as the activex war of old. HTML5 video powered by h.264 is going to be more and more ubiquitous as the multi-platform video format for the web. Chrome's decision to support it natively and the fact that Youtube are experimenting with HTML5 h.264 powered video more and more pretty much means it's not going to remain a niche tool like activex.
So, who here is loving google chrome >>>*
Personally, I find it faster, more responsive, and seemingly "smoother" than safari. That's not to say Safari is the anthesis of that, it's handles much better than Firefox, but it's not *quite* as snappy or smooth as Chrome IMHO.
Oh, and it's extensions are getting better.
Firefox has really lost it's way since the days that it slayed IE. It's not bad really, it's just now that it's a measurable margin behind Safari and Chrome in pretty much everything I can think of.
Oh, and it's HTML5 h.264 boycott is killing it for me. I'm sorry, but h.264 is not the same as the activex war of old. HTML5 video powered by h.264 is going to be more and more ubiquitous as the multi-platform video format for the web. Chrome's decision to support it natively and the fact that Youtube are experimenting with HTML5 h.264 powered video more and more pretty much means it's not going to remain a niche tool like activex.
So, who here is loving google chrome >>>*