Sidebar Sidebar
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

Software With The Most Vulnerabilities

not sure about that as they would not 'sum up', its the same vulnerability across several windows versions....
 
  • Like
Reactions: gotluck
Amazing (or maybe not surprising) that Flash has that many vulnerabilities and is not even a browser, much less an OS. What a pile of garbage.
 
556fmjoe said:
Amazing (or maybe not surprising) that Flash has that many vulnerabilities and is not even a browser, much less an OS. What a pile of garbage.
Click to expand...

What's more amazing is that Java is so much lower on the list, when there are so many people that swear it's still the most vulnerable.
[doublepost=1455295436][/doublepost]
b0fh666 said:
not sure about that as they would not 'sum up', its the same vulnerability across several windows versions....
Click to expand...

You might be right to a point. But some versions of software frameworks are require a specific versions of Windows.
 
b0fh666 said:
not sure about that as they would not 'sum up', its the same vulnerability across several windows versions....
Click to expand...
There's some stacking that would occur. There are vulnerabilities that only affect Windows 10, for example. Or others that started with Windows 8+ that don't affect Windows XP/Vista/7, etc.
 
Study isn't complete without data on criticality and if it's remote or local exploit. A bunch of low criticality local exploits are nothing compared to one high criticality remote exploit.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: willmtaylor
nothing new.. just google "most vulnerable" and see the results during last years...
 
LIVEFRMNYC said:
The chart fragments Windows by version, but not OSX. Windows versions as one would make the top of the list.

IIS web server was also used a lot back in the days which had more attacks than Apache.
Click to expand...


That chart is completely bogus (well, to try and use as a metric for "security") anyway as it doesn't take into account severity and whether or not they are remotely exploitable or not in the default (or reasonable) configuration.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Zirel and willmtaylor
throAU said:
That chart is completely bogus (well, to try and use as a metric for "security") anyway as it doesn't take into account severity and whether or not they are remotely exploitable or not in the default (or reasonable) configuration.
Click to expand...

The chart isn't garbage it just doesn't tell us everything we need to know its just a count of vulnerabilities.
 
  • Like
Reactions: aristobrat, MrAverigeUser and throAU
MrAverigeUser said:
what a ridiculous statement of an apple fanatic....
Click to expand...
Try using Server 2016 for any period of time. Microsoft has no idea what they are doing anymore. The categorized settings are useless, network adapter settings are hidden, server manager is completely jumbled around. There are so many redundant menus and settings, it's a disorganized mess.

Windows 10 is the same mess, but is at least more user friendly out of the box.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MrAverigeUser
You must log in or register to reply here.
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.
Top Bottom
Back