Looks like ATTO sells a Thunderbolt → Dual 40G adaptor for a mere $1,995!Yeah this is a drag. The only TB dock with 10GbE is the OWC Pro TB3 dock @ $299. Else you need to get a $150 TB3 to 10GbE adapter, and the prices (and size!) have never seemed to budge.
I completely agree. A 2.5 GbE controller chip is less than $3 (example: Intel i225-V is $2.4 according to https://www.servethehome.com/current-intel-i225-2-5gbe-nics-are-missing-big-feature/, while the more commonly used and lower quality Realtek 8125B should be even cheaper).I like this new wave of Thunderbolt 4 docks being all the rage but since it’s 2021 why none of them sports a 2.5Gbps ethernet port? (I understand a 10Gbe would be a bit taxing thermal-wise, but at least give us 2.5G...gigabit is so last decade..)
Considering how cheap it would be for them to add it I just think it is stupid of Sonnet not to. It would also be a great differentiator versus the competition. Regarding the market, 2.5 GbE is now commonly available on most mid to high-end PC motherboards (for example the majority of AMD X570 or Intel Z490 boards). Switches are coming down below $150, but you can also use without switch to hook up directly to NASes with faster ports.I wonder how big a market there is for >1 Gb ethernet? In my experience, MacRumors is an echo chamber of super-techie people, while the general Mac community isn't as techie.
This one is $249. Adding only $50 to get 10 GbE with the OWC Pro dock is quite attractive.Yeah this is a drag. The only TB dock with 10GbE is the OWC Pro TB3 dock @ $299. Else you need to get a $150 TB3 to 10GbE adapter, and the prices (and size!) have never seemed to budge.
Okay,Why would Thunderbolt 4 exist if it were the exact same standard as USB4?
Yes, M1 Macs have USB4 ports that support Thunderbolt 3 Alt Mode but are not certified as Thunderbolt 4. This is totally permissible according to the USB4 specification.
Apple is not breaking any standards.
Yes, Thunderbolt 4 hubs will work with all Macs with Thunderbolt 3 or USB4 ports running macOS 11.1 Big Sur or later. Yes, they will allow you to directly connect up to three additional Thunderbolt devices.
You can connect up to 6 devices to each Thunderbolt/USB4 port on an M1 Mac, either via daisy chaining or using Thunderbolt/USB4 hubs/docks.
They can call them USB4 because they are USB4.
Yes, people have tried.
Maybe you could try reading previous articles/posts about Thunderbolt/USB4 hubs and M1 Macs on this site, or even the tech spec pages for these products which explain compatibility quite clearly.
Wiki says:TB4 automatically meets the requirements of USB4, but not the other way around.
Yes, you can connect 3 TB devices through the hubs on M1 Macs. I have an OWC Thunderbolt 4 hub and it works,
All M1 Macs support 2 displays natively, but since the Air & Pro have a built-in display which counts as 1 of those, they can only have 1 external display without software workarounds.Not sure why this keeps getting passed around but M1 Mini can support 2 monitors.
![]()
Mac mini - Technical Specifications
See all the technical specifications for Mac mini with the M4 or M4 Pro chip.www.apple.com
Video Support
Simultaneously supports up to two displays:
- One display with up to 6K resolution at 60Hz connected via Thunderbolt and one display with up to 4K resolution at 60Hz connected via HDMI 2.0
Market research shows I only buy devices that make my desk look like spaghetti-octopuses. /sSo the computer attaches from the FRONT? Seems kind of odd... the upstream TB4 port should be in the back...
The freely downloadable USB4 specification describes everything in exquisite detail.Okay,
can you point a a link or tell how these works?
Does the hub show to the master device as a usb device?
And if you connect a tb device to this hub, then that tb stream is encapsuled in usb (alt mode) stream?
How about an tb3 to usb4 adapter for us with old tb3 ports? Then a tb4 hub after that. And...
I was about to comment about this. its absolutely horribleThat picture is so badly photoshoped that my eyes hurt
Aside from the upstream facing port and three downstream facing Thunderbolt/USB4 ports, Goshen Ridge only provides a single USB 3.2 Gen 2x1 port and a single PCIe Gen3 x1 port. I expect to see most designs eschew PCIe based controllers entirely for the sake of compatibility, but also reduced complexity and cost.TPS65988: Titan ridge output ports - Interface forum - Interface - TI E2E support forums
Part Number: TPS65988 Hi team, On the Intel titan ridge reference design, it shows that TR have one PCIe Gen 3, one DP and one USB3.1 Gen 2 output as below showse2e.ti.com
![]()
Adaptertek Technology Co., Ltd.
Adaptertek and Intel Collaborate to Release the World's First Thunderbolt 3 Titan Ridge ModuleWith the support of Intel (Shenzhen), Dong Guan Chen Shuan Electronic Co., Ltd (Adaptertek) pioneered thewww.adaptertek.com
Titan Ridge Thunderbolt 3 controllers (as shown in the 1st link above) had 2 Thunderbolt 3 ports, an x4 PCIe 3.0 port, 1 Displayport, and 1 USB 3.1 Gen 2 port on the controller. It seemed like all Titan Ridge docks ended up targeting compatibility with non-Thunderbolt USB-C computers and so didn't utilize the x4 PCIe 3.0 port. Instead all the non-display ports like USB-C, USB-A, Ethernet, SD card, and audio are connected through a series of internal USB hubs to the Titan Ridge's single internal USB 3.1 Gen 2 port and so are bottlenecked to a combined 10Gb/s (as shown in the Titan Ridge Thunderbolt 3 dock reference design in the 2nd link). This provides more bandwidth for the non-display ports than a basic Type-C USB 3.1 Gen 2 hub, but less than older Alpine Ridge Thunderbolt 3 docks where the non-display ports were implemented using dedicated controllers off the x4 PCIe 3.0 port.
Are Goshen Ridge Thunderbolt 4 docks still implementing compatibility with non-Thunderbolt USB-C computers by hanging all the non-display ports off Goshen Ridge's USB 3.1 Gen 2 port? The Ethernet port in the Sonnet Echo 11 Thunderbolt 4 dock is from a Realtek RTL8153B which is an USB-Ethernet controller rather than a PCIe-Ethernet controller suggests this to be the case. Does anyone know if Goshen Ridge at least has more than one internal USB 3.1 Gen 2 port now or are all the USB-A, ethernet, SD card, and audio ports still bottlenecked to the 10Gb/s of a single internal USB 3.1 Gen 2 port?
Probably performs exactly the same. They gotta be using the same board from an OEM. This happen sometimes, even among bigger peripheral makers like them. The CalDigit TB3 bus powered hub that even Apple Stores have it, is literally the same one that OWC makes, just with the logo printed differently.This Sonnet dock bears an uncanny resemblance to the OWC dock as far as the layout anyway.
![]()
OWC 11-Port Thunderbolt Dock for Mac & Thunderbolt PCs
Expand your workstation with the OWC 11-Port Thunderbolt 4 Dock. Connect all your peripherals, displays, & devices with ease. Simplify your setup now!eshop.macsales.com
View attachment 1732020
View attachment 1732021
Which one will be better? 🤔
That picture is so badly photoshoped that my eyes hurt
Totally agree (with both of you). What device is that supposed to be, the one next to his right hand?I was about to comment about this. its absolutely horrible
I believe you meant ‘octopi’, lol.Market research shows I only buy devices that make my desk look like spaghetti-octopuses. /s
This Sonnet dock bears an uncanny resemblance to the OWC dock as far as the layout anyway.
![]()
OWC 11-Port Thunderbolt Dock for Mac & Thunderbolt PCs
Expand your workstation with the OWC 11-Port Thunderbolt 4 Dock. Connect all your peripherals, displays, & devices with ease. Simplify your setup now!eshop.macsales.com
View attachment 1732020
View attachment 1732021
Which one will be better? 🤔
This one appears to support two 5K displays, which is different from other docks.I have an honest question and hope not to get a snarky reply: why would I pay $250 for this one instead of $60 for the Aukey TB dock that’s available on Amazon? Aukey is a familiar brand that makes lots of high quality chargers, cables, etc. I don’t see why I’d pay $250 for this.
Thunderbolt 4 and Thunderbolt 3 using the newer Titan Ridge controllers support 2 x DisplayPort 1.4 streams with Display Stream Compression in a single cable allowing 2 x 5K displays assuming the GPU is capable of it.this dock appears to support two 5K displays. How does this work over one cable? According to apple's own specs, the macbook's that do support this, require two TB3 (one in each side to power each). I assure this was to do with bandwidth limitations combination cables. Is this solved now?