I find it ironic to see posts like this on macrumors. you can literally do the exact same type of comparison for most of the apple products. you can think sonos as the "apple" of connected sound systems.Still think Sonos gear is massively overrated and overpriced, in the same way Bose is.
My parents got an LG sound bar (with bass unit and two satellite speakers, all wireless) for 1/3 of the cost of the Sonos equivalent offering. Excellent hardware quality and the sound is top-notch.
USB-C line-in would be awesome - makes it at great computer attached speaker without wi-fi/bluetooth lag.
Most of Apple's gear is of good quality, and the nearest competitor is mostly comparable price-wise.I find it ironic to see posts like this on macrumors. you can literally do the exact same type of comparison for most of the apple products. you can think sonos as the "apple" of connected sound systems.
I think you are missing the point of sonos, it's not just about how it sounds. sonos has some serious patents (they sued google and won for example), they specialize in synchronizing music with almost no latency over wireless network. I understand in your parents' use case, they are just plugging it in to their tv like any speaker would work, and they couldn't care less about wireless multi room audio. but that's not the main selling point of sonos vs lg, so I agree that it is over rated for your parents but I wouldn't call it overrated/overpriced for the technology itself.Most of Apple's gear is of good quality, and the nearest competitor is mostly comparable price-wise.
Sonos's gear is also of good quality, but it is wildly more expensive than a comparable setup from elsewhere. As I said in my original post, the LG setup sounded just as good, and wasn't anywhere near the same price.
Not missing the point at all, and I am fully aware of the other ecosystem benefits and selling points Sonos have. However, most people I know with Sonos gear pretty much do as my parents have - plug it into their TV and don't use any of the other technologies. It's just a fancy speaker system that they like to talk about. AirPlay 2 is pretty solid for latency though, I can have my HomePods, MacBook, and iMac all playing music from Apple Music and there is zero perceptible latency or delay between them. They take a moment to start / pause / volume up or down, but the listening experience (the important bit to me) is perfect.I think you are missing the point of sonos, it's not just about how it sounds. sonos has some serious patents (they sued google and won for example), they specialize in synchronizing music with almost no latency over wireless network. I understand in your parents' use case, they are just plugging it in to their tv like any speaker would work, and they couldn't care less about wireless multi room audio. but that's not the main selling point of sonos vs lg, so I agree that it is over rated for your parents but I wouldn't call it overrated/overpriced for the technology itself.
just to go back to my apple example, you can say your parents got an amazon echo for $80 and it sounds great in their kitchen, and how you don't see the point of getting a homepod for $300 because they both sound "good" have the same timer functionality.
Not missing the point at all, and I am fully aware of the other ecosystem benefits and selling points Sonos have. However, most people I know with Sonos gear pretty much do as my parents have - plug it into their TV and don't use any of the other technologies. It's just a fancy speaker system that they like to talk about. AirPlay 2 is pretty solid for latency though, I can have my HomePods, MacBook, and iMac all playing music from Apple Music and there is zero perceptible latency or delay between them. They take a moment to start / pause / volume up or down, but the listening experience (the important bit to me) is perfect.
Not heard any recent Echos as good as the HomePod. The "Studio" one was probably going in the right direction, but the extra spend on the HomePods would be noticeable and justified (in my opinion), so I wouldn't say they were comparable in their performance vs cost. The Google Home Max was probably the only other decent smart speaker (note: speaker, not assistant) that would have went toe-to-toe with the HomePod in performance vs cost, it was an excellent product.
Lol you’re getting the hintBit annoyed that the Era 300 will be needed for Atmos surround functionality with the Arc. Pushes the cost of a 5.1.4 system through the roof!
a white speaker just like white only headphones is offensive to me lol.Admittedly taste is objective, but I do have to wonder why people find these ugly enough to actually critique. They are smooth, symmetrical, plain white/inoffensive minimalist with no gaudy feature and would blend into the majority of decors easily. They are textbook Apple design language.
I'm confused - I re-read my original post several times, and I can't see the part where I said Sonos is the only solution for home cinema. Could you point out that part to me? For me, it was simply the choice I made at the time, after considering the other alternatives. For home theater, it's still better than what Apple offers - I'd love to see Apple change that someday.Why is it that Sonos have people convinced that they are The only solution for home cinema? Plenty of other systems out there offering Atmos, thE Arc isn’t the only device on the market that does this.
There's a HomePod mini sitting about two feet away from my Sonos Arc. If I want to listen to music, I ask the Arc ("Hey Sonos..." - and the Arc responds by playing whatever I request from Apple Music). If I want to control the lights, or set timers or alarms, or add reminders, I ask the HomePod. If the HomePod ever starts playing music, it's because Siri f'd up again (that happens occasionally, followed by me shouting, "HEY SIRI STOP!") - Siri seems to have a default to lean toward interpreting requests it doesn't know as being song / artist names, sometimes; if there were a way I could tell Siri to never interpret any request to the HomePod as a request for music, I'd gladly set that option.I would do like you if I could use Siri the way I use it with the HomePods also the new sensors, the intercom, the alarm and the Apple Music studio grade / atmos … which are features I use everyday …
Fair enough … whatever works for you and is important … personally I am ok for now with my two HomePod sitting by the side of my tv and updates make the sound better and better. For music, I love the sound of my HomePod / HomePod mini vs Sonos one … We can’t have it all and I am waiting patiently for the real deal.There's a HomePod mini sitting about two feet away from my Sonos Arc. If I want to listen to music, I ask the Arc ("Hey Sonos..." - and the Arc responds by playing whatever I request from Apple Music). If I want to control the lights, or set timers or alarms, or add reminders, I ask the HomePod. If the HomePod ever starts playing music, it's because Siri f'd up again (that happens occasionally, followed by me shouting, "HEY SIRI STOP!") - Siri seems to have a default to lean toward interpreting requests it doesn't know as being song / artist names, sometimes; if there were a way I could tell Siri to never interpret any request to the HomePod as a request for music, I'd gladly set that option.
I'd love to have just one device that can do both (ideally, from my current standpoint, Siri built into the Arc). But we're not there yet. No number of HomePods can compete properly with a Sonos 5.1 system. For one, there's no HomePod subwoofer yet. For another, HomePods still have to fake a center channel.