Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
All they have to do is make it the size of an iPhone, and add a phone, but keeping the game controls, and it might be compelling to some gamers as a phone. Not and iPhone competitor, though.
 
Sony seems to be lagging behind in the whole gaming department lately. I really don't think this idea is going to go anywhere and will probably just lose them money in the end. It does make sense though because they do have access to a lot of music but it wouldn't have taken a genius to think of adding movie and music downloads to psn a few years back. It's just to late.
 
Approach two - Mac / Windows compatible - easy to pull music off PSP and put it back on. There will be an easy way to get music bought on the PSP into iTunes, etc.
There is ONLY "Approach Two". If you read their statements, they've clearly noted their biggest screw-up.
"If we had gone with open technology from the start, I think we probably would have beaten Apple," Stringer told Nikkei Electronics Asia recently. "Sony hasn't taken open technology very seriously in the past. Its Connect music download service was a failure. It was based on OpenMG, a proprietary digital rights management (DRM) technology. At the time, we thought we would make more money that way than with open technology, because we could manage the customers and their downloads.
If they take approach two, then great! I'd love a new PSP :D
Don't take off the condom just yet. ;)

For a company that, lately, has been so "Ready, Go, Start" with things... Sony has a lot to answer for. The PSP already supports music downloaded from iTunes. Adding an application to acquire music, isn't anything of a stretch... the big question, is what their "value proposition" is. Will the music cost the same, or less, than Apple's iTunes? What open format will it be downloaded to? What added innovation are they bringing to the table?

I'm a little put off that you need to put your PSP in "USB Mode" to transfer music from your iMac. Sony needs to build in more "auto-sensing" technology, for its WiFi and USB-mode options. It's still very ugly out there.

~ CB
 
They are not competing with the iPhone they are competing with the Touch. The Touch is the funnest ipod ever :D
 
The PSP is a great game machine. Better specs in certain ways, bigger screen, traditional physical controls for traditional-style games where that's important.

The iPod Touch (and even better, the iPhone with GPS, vibrate and always-on Internet) is ALSO a great game machine. In different ways. Better specs in its own certain ways, FAR more portable, tilt control, multitouch, super-easy app shopping, super-easy app updating, mass numbers of games at low prices, and all the other benefits people know well.

Both are good choices for games--but for some KINDS of games one or the other has a clear benefit.

But for portable music (and Web browsing, email, maps, etc.) the iPod (and iTunes store) has the overwhelming advantage.

Meanwhile, some of the PSP's gaming advantages will go away with faster iPhone hardware (surely coming from Apple) and/or with physical control packs (surely coming from third parties).

New PSPs will likely evolve too... but they'd have to evolve astonishingly to catch up with the iPhone OS and platform as a whole, or even just for music.
 
eah, I bet you came to that conclusion scientifically huh? Got any sources for those outrageous statements?
Of course that's my own conclusion. I was refuting an earlier, also unscientific, claim to the contrary (that "hordes of people" were "clamoring" for Blu-Ray in their Macs). Do you have evidence for that? Apparently Apple agrees with me, for now.

Anecdotally I only know of one person who is "clamoring" for Blu-Ray, and he's a video editor. I know many dozens of people who own Macs, and a lot of video professionals, programmers, and gadget freaks. Several of those might be interested in Blu-Ray, but they're not clamoring for it. So my unscientific conclusion is that even among tech-oriented people and gadget freaks, only a few are interested, and none of who I would consider "normal" users are interested in (or even aware of) Blu-Ray at all. Again, I don't think boards like this one are a good representation of Apple's user base in recent years. You can find threads here with people excited about Blu-Ray, but it doesn't reflect the general population at all.

Personally I would like Blu-Ray and would use it, I just don't think it's a priority for Apple, and really, I can live without it.
 
What I was really trying to say is that I find it amusing that every time MR posts a story that some other company is competing with Apple, many forum posters resort to bashing the competitor as a whole, often in complete ignorance to good things about that company (the most common example being Microsoft). My only point was that though this particular aspect of Sony's business (namely electronic music players/music sales) might have so far been a failure doesn't mean the company is entirely worthless and incapable of new ideas and innovative products (as Goona seemed to be stating). I just chose Blu-Ray as an example, because plenty of MR forum users want Blu-Ray support in Macs, and Blu-Ray wouldn't exist if not for Sony's contributions. So I figured Blu-Ray was a relevant reminder to at least some MR posters that Sony isn't worthless.
Mmm, gothcha. To me it's not so much that Sony is worthless, but seem spread too thin nowadays that they've lost their focus. This could easily happen to Apple in the future too, if they reach too far and start making televisions, car stereos, game consoles, home automation networks, etc. So far they've kept the focus and remained shrewd with their decisions on what areas they want to go into, but the temptation to branch out and capitalize on their popular brand must be there.
 
Mmm, gothcha. To me it's not so much that Sony is worthless, but seem spread too thin nowadays that they've lost their focus. This could easily happen to Apple in the future too, if they reach too far and start making televisions, car stereos, game consoles, home automation networks, etc. So far they've kept the focus and remained shrewd with their decisions on what areas they want to go into, but the temptation to branch out and capitalize on their popular brand must be there.

One side of me wishes they wouldn't stray too far from their current lineup, another part of me is looking forward to the possible new directions apple's might take. I'm on the fence concerning this one.
 
and reasons the psp is better for gaming
- Bigger screen
- Buttons for tactile feed back and trying to do more than two things at once
- the Playstation Store, and access to a back library of PS1 Games
- itunes program (the fact you dont have to use that peice of **** program)
- expandable storage
- downloadable demos from the Playstation Store
- Support for the whole playstation family
- Video Skype
- PLaystation store, playstation store playstation store
- playstation network for online things
- a strong following of big game developers
- freedom to do whatever they can with the hardware, with no stupid limitations (demos, adhoc gaming, game sharing)
oh and
- PLaystation store, playstation store playstation store

With things like the web browser, remember the PSP did come out 3 years before the iPhone.

Itunes is a piece of ****, but it's one of the most downloaded and used programs..:rolleyes:
 
iPod Touch is better than PSP in this genres of gaming:
- adventures (input)
- enigmas (input)
- casual gaming (free or unexpensive games)
- games which involve inputting text
- card games (input)
- "other games where touching is faster than selecting"

PSP is way better than iPod Touch in this genres:
- every other genre of gaming
- graphic power
- ps1 games as you said

The fact that casual games by virtue encompasses all genres by ways of a subset of each genre which is generally more accessable, means that you can't say a touch input would be better.

Adventures are also too wild a card to simply say touch screen is better than all games. Card games too, which generally have moves which limit it to a few options, so i would forward the propostion that both interfaces accomplish the task equally as well.

But I think that for MOST PEOPLE, iPod Touch is simply better and more versatile. So I don't SEE any COMPETITION, becouse they are TOO DIFFERENT. PSP is more "specific", iPod Touch is good for a lot of things. (it would take ages to write them, just think about all the programs in App Store....)

The iPod touch is useful for music. The PSP has a bigger screen which is better for movies, a better quality one (at least on the newer models), and expandabl storage for those large movie files. Too many of the good apps on the app store require a data connection, which is only constant on the iPhone, so the ipod touch is useless in that fact.


Ok, so you are one of "those people". Ok.
Try iTunes before speaking...
It's crazy to sync music without itunes, after you get used to what you can do with iTunes..

Have an iPhone, use itunes, hate itunes. Slow, crash prone, and slow.

Un-portable console.
I'm good with 8gb/16gb/32gb iPod Touch, at least I can put it in the pocket....

Fit in jacket pocket, and expandable storage.

I hope you are not seriously comparing App Store (mr. "40000 apps in 10 months, you find every kind of stuff, 1 billion downloads in 10 months") to Playstation Store....
Look at the programs on App Store and the amazing things you can do with them and iPod Touch before speaking....

You are not seriously comparing the 99% POS apps like a tip calculator to the quality stuff put out on the PSN store. Quality not quantity.

Again i have an Iphone have looked, the only decent apps i use are the few games, or the information gathering ones (like rail times and tube journeys, or shazam, deliveries, flixster etc etc) which is useless on ipod touch)

A super-following of big and small games AND PROGRAMS developers, which lead to an EXPLOSION of apps in few months.

Yes, but more big name game developers on the PSP.

Freedom to do nothing for NORMAL-NON-GEEK people...
Freedom of using 40000 apps on iPod Touch....

I wasn't clear enough here. I meant freedom for the developers to do what they want with the hardware.

You can say whatever you want, but iPod Touch is WAY MORE A COMPLETE AND VERSATILE DEVICE than Sony PSP...and you can put it in your pocket...
So, if you're not interested in PSP GAMES, iPod Touch is a NO-BRAINER. The multimedia capabilities of PSP cannot be of any help to PSP in this comparison, that's why I said that "this news doesn't change the situation".

iPhone yes, ipod touch no.

DISCLAIMER: I repeat, I didn't say that psp isn't better at gaming. PSP is better at gaming (except some genres where the multitouch input method is TREMENDOUSLY BETTER).But PSP is SO SO SO WORSE in everything else if compared to iPod Touch. And it's a heavy COFFIN you will simply leave in a drawer and don't carry around....

tremendously is a strong word. There are soo many more games where a physical button is soo much better than a software button, or 10 physical buttons and a joystick.


I wasn't referring to the browser itself, I said that it's useless as a browser or for Instant Messenging because of the text inputting method, which is indipendent from the "age", it's simply inadequate. It's shame that sony TV ads PROMISE to SURF and do MESSENGER...a real SHAME.....

Oh yes and its a shame for apple to say theres an app for every thing....
 
Man you guys can be negative. The PS3 and PSP are fantastic devices. I use my PSP everyday to watch movies/TV Shows, and if you think the iPhones games have anything on the PSP's you are mistaken.

Good on Sony, yeah very late in the game but competition is good and i would definitely be up for this as well as the PSN video store coming to the UK later this year.

Not sure people think the PSP isn't fantastic in many ways. I know there are great games out there for it. But I do think a music store for it would be irrelevant, a surefire waste of resources and a failure.
 
Don't dismiss them so easily

Sony has made some mistakes, which we're all aware of. Apple has benefitted from those mistakes.

But if Sony is really willing to make fundamental changes to its product line, and the way it does business accordingly, they could take the market back. Seriously.

One thing that observing the tech industry has taught me is that nothing lasts forever. Apple's lead in mobile music certainly isn't set in stone.
 
Sony has made some mistakes, which we're all aware of. Apple has benefitted from those mistakes.

But if Sony is really willing to make fundamental changes to its product line, and the way it does business accordingly, they could take the market back. Seriously.

One thing that observing the tech industry has taught me is that nothing lasts forever. Apple's lead in mobile music certainly isn't set in stone.

First Sony needs to do something about the PS3. If the way they handled its marketing and dev cycle is any indication, Apple will have a ridiculously easy time.

Sony is losing the console wars. Hard. If they can't manage the PS3 amongst all the competition, you really think they'll do anything against Apple's momentum on Apple's own turf?

The PSP is yesterday's device. Sony has only a fraction of the mindhsare it used to have. Sony needs entirely new, visionary leadership, not some fool's errand to challenge Apple because it's bleeding like a stuck pig in the console wars and whatever other market they're half-assing it in.
 
I love my PSP. I truly do. It used to go everywhere with me. Now, with the I-phone, I hardly ever use it. A music store would be too little, too late for this device.
 
First Sony needs to do something about the PS3. If the way they handled its marketing and dev cycle is any indication, Apple will have a ridiculously easy time.

Sony is losing the console wars. Hard. If they can't manage the PS3 amongst all the competition, you really think they'll do anything against Apple's momentum on Apple's own turf?

The PSP is yesterday's device. Sony has only a fraction of the mindhsare it used to have. Sony needs entirely new, visionary leadership, not some fool's errand to challenge Apple because it's bleeding like a stuck pig in the console wars and whatever other market they're half-assing it in.

Actually the PS3 is doing pretty well in the console wars. The PS3 has sold more than the 360 on a month by month basis. The reason 360 is ahead of the PS3 is because it had a one year head start in sales. And this is all while the PS3 is more expensive than the 360. PS3 has averaged 742,000 units per month while 360 has only managed 719,000 per month. Pretty bad considering the PS3 is twice the price of the 360. The PS3 sales will explode once they get to the all-important $300 price point, most likely this year.

As for half-assing it in other markets, they make the best TV's in the market, along with Samsung. Their cameras aren't too shabby either. You might have a point in car and home audio however.
 
Actually the PS3 is doing pretty well in the console wars. The PS3 has sold more than the 360 on a month by month basis. The reason 360 is ahead of the PS3 is because it had a one year head start in sales. And this is all while the PS3 is more expensive than the 360. PS3 has averaged 742,000 units per month while 360 has only managed 719,000 per month. Pretty bad considering the PS3 is twice the price of the 360. The PS3 sales will explode once they get to the all-important $300 price point, most likely this year.

As for half-assing it in other markets, they make the best TV's in the market, along with Samsung. Their cameras aren't too shabby either. You might have a point in car and home audio however.

They USED to make the best TVs. Years ago. What, Sony Bravias?? C'mon, Samsung, LG, and Panasonic (especially Panasonic) have caught up and surpassed Sony. Sony is just another name in the TV biz. I suppose they still make good receievers, I have one myself, but really, Sony is just another member of the pack that happens to be more diversified than the rest.
 
The fact that casual games by virtue encompasses all genres by ways of a subset of each genre which is generally more accessable, means that you can't say a touch input would be better.

Casual games are used by casual gamers, which get used to the touch in 5 seconds, want a pocketable device and a device which is good for many other things beside gameing.
Adventures are also too wild a card to simply say touch screen is better than all games.
I meant graphical adventures and I'm sure that in 99% touch is better.
Card games too, which generally have moves which limit it to a few options, so i would forward the propostion that both interfaces accomplish the task equally as well.
I don't think so.
The iPod touch is useful for music.

Sorry but this is BLASPHEMY. Ipod NANO is useful for music.
Ipod touch is a inexpensive FULLY FEATURED PALM-TOP COMPUTER which can be used to:
- comfortably open every kind of Office, XML and iWork document
- comfortably read pdf
- read ebooks with excellent applications like Stanza
- control your PC/MAC from everywhere using VNC or similar applications
- use complex and specific calculators and graphic calculators
- create spreadsheet on the go
- create text on the go
- manage COMPLEX email-situations like 10 gmail accounts in IMAP or you 3000-contacts Microsoft Exchange account
- use every possible instant messenger (MSN, gtalk, yahoo, AIM, ecc.)
- update your blog
- take around a database of drugs with side effects and so (handy if you're a nurse or medic)
- carry arround a complete dictionary with pronounce
- excellent clients for twitter and facebook
- excellent RSS feed readers
- specific application for a lot of specific things for phisicians, engeneers, ect
- and these are just the first apps that came in to my mind!!

YOUR PROBLEM IS THAT YOU DON'T KNOW APP STORE. Full stop.
We're talking about a fully featured handheld "palm", this kind of stuff was very appreciated a few years ago (you know, when pocketPCs HAD NOT phone connectivity).
So you can't compare it to a MONO-PURPOSE DEVICE which is good at gaming and crap at everything else, like psp.
Too many of the good apps on the app store require a data connection, which is only constant on the iPhone, so the ipod touch is useless in that fact.
1) not true, a lot of excellent apps work offline, so ipod touch can be unvaluable even when not under wifi
2) c'mon, i heard in USA wifi is in every mcdonald, starbuck and stuff like that....
3) but still, I repeat it can be fantastic even without connection, there are so many excellent apps that work offline
Have an iPhone, use itunes, hate itunes. Slow, crash prone, and slow.
Mac or PC?
For Mac it is false.
For PC I don't know, I heard it got better in the last few releases.
Fit in jacket pocket, and expandable storage.
"Is that a banana in there or you're just happy to see me??" :D
C'mon, PSP is NOT a portable device in everyday life....you must bring it "on purpose".....that's why most of us (I own one too) leave it to take the dust...

You are not seriously comparing the 99% POS apps like a tip calculator to the quality stuff put out on the PSN store. Quality not quantity.

This is false, it's the typical anti-appstore propanganda, it's strange that you have not mentioned iFart, that's a classic in this kind of situation.
You got an iPhone but you don't know App Store very much...
There's plenty of useless sh*t but we're talking about FORTY THOUSAND (and counting..) apps....let's say that 90% is sh*t (but this is false), we've got FOUR THOUSAND good apps left...that's four thousand more things that an ipod touch can do more than a psp.....

Again i have an Iphone have looked, the only decent apps i use are the few games, or the information gathering ones (like rail times and tube journeys, or shazam, deliveries, flixster etc etc) which is useless on ipod touch)

This is false, search better. Of course there are a lot of specific stuff (medical, electronic, IT, flight, programming, navigation, ecc.) that maybe you don't even understand...so, from your limited needs/knowledge only a few apps appear decent...but I don't think you know and understand all the 40k apps...

I wasn't clear enough here. I meant freedom for the developers to do what they want with the hardware.

"Freedom" is an abused concept...
Look at the APIs of the new iphone SDK....like the external accessories API....I prefer good results on the field than ideal freedom...

iPhone yes, ipod touch no.
That's non-sense, PSP doesn't have phone connectivity...

tremendously is a strong word. There are soo many more games where a physical button is soo much better than a software button, or 10 physical buttons and a joystick.

"soo many" is a strong word.
I think it's 50-50.
Enigma, adventures, cards, table games, ecc: TOUCH BETTER

Beat'em'up, Racing, 3rd person, Sport, RPG, FPS: BUTTONS BETTER

But, think about this: somehow, the first geners are more "fit for mobility/small_screen playing" than the latter. I mean, if a mobile devices has to be good at one of those groups, it's better (IMHO) that it is good at the first group.

Oh yes and its a shame for apple to say theres an app for every thing....
"Everything" is used in everyday life with the meaning "reasonably a lot of things". It's not as shameful as the Sony ads, which promise some NON-EXISTING functions...
 
Sony seems to be lagging behind in the whole gaming department lately.

Have you seen the list of upcoming sony exclusives?
Motorstorm, Little Big Planet, DiRT 2, Kingdom Hearts, and Dissida are coming to psp and the ps3 is gong to dominate with games like inFamous, GT5, God of War 3, Heavy Rain, Katamari Forever, Mag, Uncharted 2, Ratchet and Clank ACIT, and more in the next year.
Sony is still going strong in the gaming world.
 
Comparing a PSP to an iPod Touch . . . good for a laugh maybe.

Sony is way behind in so many markets. And all they can do is go on about Apple and "had we done this, had we done that." Too funny.
 
People still buy PSPs?

Haha, I know right! :p

What ever happened to those stupid disc movies for PSPs? :rolleyes:

iPhone rules! Just wait till the Tablet comes out now too Sony and Nintendo! :D

There are soo many more games where a physical button is soo much better than a software button, or 10 physical buttons and a joystick.

In case you haven't noticed computing and gaming even more are all moving away from physical buttons and onto new technology like multi-touch and spacial motion gesture technology. Even Microsoft is working on it for the XBOX.
 
Hmm, a store?

I hope Sony has fixed their typing then. The last time I used the PSP to browse the web in order to enter some text I had to use some ridiculous cellphone texting type scheme despite having the same a directional pad and an X button on the device that the games played on the PSP use for text entry.
 
They USED to make the best TVs. Years ago. What, Sony Bravias?? C'mon, Samsung, LG, and Panasonic (especially Panasonic) have caught up and surpassed Sony. Sony is just another name in the TV biz. I suppose they still make good receievers, I have one myself, but really, Sony is just another member of the pack that happens to be more diversified than the rest.

Umm yeah, Sony Bravia!! Notice I said along with Samsung. Those two have the best PQ and imo Sony's features slightly outweighed Samsung's, like adjustable picture settings in game mode unavailable in the comparable Sammy model. Sony and Sammy even use the same glass in some of their TV's. I didn't say LG, Panasonic and Toshiba don't compare, but Sony and Sammy have that little extra something.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.