This is one example of the mindset of Apple and how they operate as a whole.And it's Apple who chose to not support Sony's LDAC, despite it being open-source and royalty free to use on transmitting side (i.e. phone). It's even integrated into Android's AOSP for every OEM to use freely, so that's a shame.
No update from Spotify at all. Last update blamed "licensing" issues. This tips the scales of my love/hate relationship with Spotify.Speaking of Hi-Res audio on that box. Does anyone know when Spotify is going to launch their much-rumored hifi service? Did they can that idea ?
They are not out yet, so hard to tell.I’ve never tried these. How good are they for listening to music? I never use my AirPods Pro to listen to music because the sound quality is meh.
Wait, if I have my X3s wired through an external DAC they’ll downsample the signal? Seriously?I have the XM3. Great set of headphones, noise cancellation was way ahead of the competition when I got them a few years ago. Haven’t tried anything since that would convince me to upgrade. I have AirPod Pros that I use at the gym and for phone calls.
The issue with both is the lack of lossless over Bluetooth. 320Kbps sounds pretty terrible when you are used to Tidal or FLAC.
You can get around that using wired input on the XM3s. The onboard DAC is pretty good, and no point using an external high res DAC like the dragonfly cobalt as the headphones will invariable downsample the signal with its onboard DAC.
Long story short the next version of Bluetooth REALLY needs a ton more bandwidth if we’re to have CD quality (never mind lossless) audio wirelessly.
That’s likely to be the time I next upgrade.
Why is that?I prefer the XM4’s over the APM. This is very exciting.
No headphone will support lossless over Bluetooth. There simply isn't enough bandwidth. Wifi could do it but consumes too much power. I'm sure Apple and others are working on it.sony dont support losless on ios devices? so, waiting for the next iteration of Airpods Max, hopefully they will get losless over the air with low latency.
What most people don’t understand about the horrible name is that Sony - with regards to decisions being made with large markets like the US in mind - is doing what a lot of Japanese companies do. The same thing Acura started doing with its car models after the model names took off on their own wings. They choose names that force consumers to also say the name of the brand.I'm an old school Sony fanboy. Their industrial design isn't as good as it used to be, but still pretty great. But JFC, the the names!! WH-1000XM5? Even Honda is bringing back the Integra name, get off this alpha-num trend, it was lame even when it was "cool". I have an old Sony clock/radio/alarm, it's called the Sony Dream Machine, ffs.... not the Sony AM-PM-1224-DST-5, smh.
I think we can all blame Intel for this. Weren’t they the 1st to market their CPUs with confusing number and letter identifiers?What most people don’t understand about the horrible name is that Sony - with regards to decisions being made with large markets like the US in mind - is doing what a lot of Japanese companies do. The same thing Acura started doing with its car models after the model names took off on their own wings. They choose names that force consumers to also say the name of the brand.
Sony wants to be like Apple but they aren’t there. Nobody says “I got a new Apple iPhone xx.” They just say “I got a new iPhone xx.” That’s because we all know the brand so well and more importantly, we all know exactly what to expect from the brand.
Sony wants to capture the idea that everything the brand makes is consistently very good and then we’ll see cool names for their product models.