An the role is ...
An the role is ...
When Eric Schmidt was on Apple's board pre-iPhone and completely changed Google's course on Android from "Blackberry clone" to "iPhone clone".
One of the most dirty moves Google has ever made.
I think it was what Steve Jobs said about Google when he was angry. "ssspinball" nailed it.
Maybe the South Koreans are tired of these lawsuits as well and just want to see the companies keep manufacturing cool products while 'borrowing' ideas from each other and expanding on those ideas.
Nothing funny about it. These patent laws are so ********* retarded. The only people who wins this is lawyers. This is a waste of time and resources for both Apple and Samsung and their symbiotic relationship.
I'm really glad that this court did this ruling. South Korea is worse than USA as far as corruption goes; http://www.transparency.org/cpi2012/results
I hope not as a developer I like to make money and if we come up with something truly unique I want it protected so I can make more money from our innovations.
That said, I hate patent trolls and I do think some of the patents are very weak from many companies and there does need to be reform for patents but, I don't see any harm in companies being able to protect their inventions this idea of a technology free-for-all will hurt us all in the long run. Patents aren't meant to stop innovation, it's just to make sure inventors get paid for what they did.
I hope not as a developer I like to make money and if we come up with something truly unique I want it protected so I can make more money from our innovations.
Can you explain why Schmidt was needed to do that?
is people really believing this nonsense?
If Jobs or Apple believed that Schmidt did anything like that, they would have sued him for industrial theft. They never ever said anything about Schmidt.
please, stop with that crap, Schmidt didn't stole anything, because there was no need to steal anything. and if you think apple/Google board members can steal source code, you're very naive
Steve Jobs only said anything about Android in 2010, almost two years after the release and almost a year after Schmidt left Apple boards.
And he was angry about the multi touch thing, thing that was not really patented by them
there's a reason why schmidt later was excused when the board discussed iphone. and a reason he left.
there's a reason why schmidt later was excused when the board discussed iphone. and a reason he was dismissed altogether.
Isn't Samsung a Korean company?
I think some people like the idea of the conspiracy, that Schmidt used his position to steal the iPhone, more than the rather bland reality.
It's been pretty well discussed and rather obvious but go ahead and keep that head buried in the sand.
It's been pretty well discussed and rather obvious.
What will the Android users be saying against Apple's win in California now?
Because americans aren't patriotic?Considering how patriotic South Koreans are (almost all Samsung and LG electronics and Hyundai and Kia cars) I think this verdict speaks volumes....
The only evidence that Schmidt used his position to steal IP comes exclusively from a bunch of talking heads on Apple messageboards spreading rumors rather than anything solid that directly points to him abusing his position.
Steve Jobs knew Schmidt was working on a smartphone platform while he was on the board, and Schmidt even excused himself from meetings involving the iPhone. If he did steal any Apple IP, why did it take Google nearly 2 years to come up with a competing product, and why hasn't Apple sued the hell out of them for corporate espionage and abusing their position to gather trade secrets?
The rumors don't match reality.