No.
It just looks like you didn't pony up for SS.
Everyone has a preference. I personally think it looks awesome ! And yes the SS looks great too . Can't go wrong either or .
No.
It just looks like you didn't pony up for SS.
No.
It just looks like you didn't pony up for SS.
I prefer this![]()
What do you think?
I do like this combination. Unfortunately, it's not an option for me, as the loop band only comes for larger wrist sizes, and my wrists are pretty tiny.![]()
I just feel like for the $150 entry price on these bands... I'd rather pony up to the SS model.
is this true? The one i saw in the store said the size was M/L which I thought was weird because I assumed it would have Small Medium and large options.
$550 for a Sport with the leather loop, or $1,099 for the Space Black with link bracelet.. I definitely wouldn't mind having a the link model but I don't think the extra $549 is worth it for me on the first gen.
----------
The leather loop comes in 2 lengths, but only for the 42mm watches. See here.
What do you think?
I got the sport model assuming there will be a gen2 in two years max. Imagine all the new smart watches that will be out in two years. If they waited more than 2 years, we would be super upset that our apple watch hasn't been updated yet.Hey, OP!
I can definitively promise you that this is not even close to being the best looking Apple Watch.
----------
Also I feel like a ton of people are viewing this only on the merits of price. As a result, many people are buying the cheapest one without necessarily realizing that it's also something that they are going to be stuck wearing on their wrists for 1-5 more years,
----------
Also, also,
People seem to be justifying their poor decision by saying "well, it's the first generation product so why would I spend so much on it??"
Because it's an Apple product, people! It will maintain its value extraordinarily well. So that "next time," you're only paying for a fraction of it with "new" money. And in the year or so that follows it is drastically better looking and doesn't look like a dorky toy on your wrist.
So never.
Just kidding - the only thing I think may not happen is 46mm.
I loved the look of the blue leather loop with the space grey so much I've ordered it today.
Only comes June but oh well.
Some don't like the chrome finish of the SS. Don't think it's about price, just preference.
...In your personal opinion, which is the polar opposite of a statement of absolute fact, so not a promise at all really.Hey, OP!
I can definitively promise you that this is not even close to being the best looking Apple Watch.
Unfortunately, money IS a consideration for most people on this planet, particularly regarding a highly optional gadget like the Watch. If you got cash coming out of your ears, cool, but most people don't.Also I feel like a ton of people are viewing this only on the merits of price. As a result, many people are buying the cheapest one without necessarily realizing that it's also something that they are going to be stuck wearing on their wrists for 1-5 more years,![]()
A totally valid consideration (and again, because most people aren't made of money.)People seem to be justifying their poor decision by saying "well, it's the first generation product so why would I spend so much on it??"
Theoretically. What's the current value of early model iPhones today? Not much; they can't even run the latest version of iOS. AW also has a lot more limited appeal, especially as it will only function with Apple phones.Because it's an Apple product, people! It will maintain its value extraordinarily well.
No.
It just looks like you didn't pony up for SS.
I bought the SG Sport and I think it looks great.
The best? Definitely not.