That would make it 2.66GHz 8-core.
2006/7 Mac Pro has 32-bit EFI which may be problematic in the future regarding to GPU and OS X updates. For example, 10.7 may drop support for 32-bit EFIs so that would make it a bit obsolete even though 10.6 would still be just fine.
2006 Mac Pro is a decent deal but make sure you understand the bottlenecks
cheers. some food for thought there. So in regards to your first comment, there are quad-core version of the 2.66Ghz CPU that will fit in the original 2.66Ghz Mac Pro? I read elsewhere on this forum that these have to be replaced as pairs, making it an 8-core 2.66Ghz (like you said). Let me know if i've misunderstood you.
Regarding the EFI, which generation onward use a 64-bit EFI?
So the bottlenecks of a 2006 Mac Pro (Woodcrest) would be:
-CPU limited to two 2.66Ghz quadcores (resulting in an after-market 8-core)
-8MB cache total (would this increase to 16MB, if the tower was converted to an 8-core, as you mentioned?)
-667Mhz RAM
-Possible that won't be upgradeable beyond OS 10.7
I'm still running OS 10.5.8 on my laptop, and wasn't planning to change it. have just got it all running stable (might have to consider compatibility issues between a desktop running 10.6 and my lappy on 10.5).
Ok, apart from the above question about the cache, I have a few more questions regarding the internal hard disks.
There are four slots inside. These hold 3.5" SATA HDs, but with a bracket can hold 2.5" (I have several 2.5", which my Macbook is backed up on).
I've been advised - that if you have the opportunity (and with a Mac Pro, I will) - to have a disk for all your system data (OS, applications, documents) and another for audio (sample libraries and recordings). This way, when you're working on audio, the computer/application will be running off one disk, and reading audio of another, rather than reading the same drive at once, for both processes.
So assuming this is a good idea, and assuming that SSDs have a faster access time (which Im sure i've read that they do), which of the two disks (if I can only afford one SSD at first), would I be better off using an SSD for (with the other being a standard HD)?
Thanks so much. Have been amazing : )