Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Like I've mentioned above, it's affecting non-Apple developers in such a way that Apple gets 30% of their sales, so it gives Apple huge competitive advantage on the Apple Store. It especially hurts subscription services like Spotify, which has to pay tantiems for the music and reduces the profit drastically. Mind also, that selling your service outside of the application is difficult. In most cases these 30% is just taken from YOU in addition for overpaying for your Apple phone/tablet (compare prices of games on Apple Store and Google Play). Ultimately the Apple's policy is hurting YOU, because you have to pay much more than Android users for the same stuff and the competition is much more limited on subscription services.

Apple takes the 30% and runs the App Store allowing thousands of apps to be on the App Store for free. If you want to charge money for your app through the store then you pay the fee, if you don’t want to pay a fee then you don’t charge through the App Store or you pass it onto the customer who can then decide whether to pay you direct for a lower fee but share their personal info and payment info with you or pay the higher charge and keep their info private from you. Amazon managed to do this for years with the Kindle app etc.
 
Last time I looked, Spotify have a massive market share for streaming music compared to Apple. And you can run Spotify on Apple devices... The majority of shared playlists I see being generated by news sites, tv shows etc are all on Spotify.

So like you say, is their issue that their business model wasn't sustainable in the first place?

Apple are way-off from being perfect, but this one is just confusing...
If Spotify was in this amazing position in the music industry they wouldn't have knee-jerked such a response yesterday. Also the public was none too happy with Spotify making such a stupid public stink as their stocks plummeted huge today, and Spotify deserves it. As a consumer I don't like that type of unprofessionalism from Spotify or any company. It seems to be okay with Spotify that they bundle their services with other partners but Apple can't bundle their own services, according to Spotify. SMH.
 
Hey Spotify, go f yourself. If you don’t like ’s products go launch your own damn phone. The bundle literally will save me $300 per year off what I already pay for services, all while you rip Joe Rogan and podcasting in general from their root identities as open-source, free RSS-based entertainment... so you can seduce customers over to your platform like a dinner-party at the Cosby’s.
 
my favorite thing about these threads are the god awful analogies and comparisons people make
 
This is competition. Make your service better, cheaper, or whatever to attract customers. By just being the same, you’ll fall far behind.

Jeez. I can’t stand these cry baby CEOs.
[automerge]1600276794[/automerge]
Another Lawsuit in 3. 2. 1. Spotify needs to innovate instead of cry.

Exactly!
 
Spotify wouldn't be complaining if they had a lot ton of customers. They have a high fear of going out of business after today's announcement so there aren't as many Spotify loyalists as you may think.

  • The music streaming company beat analysts’ expectations to reach 130 million paid subscribers for its premium service.
  • Premium subscribers rose 31% from a year earlier. Analysts on average were expecting Spotify to have 128.6 million paid subscribers.
 
Yeah sure. But Apple doesn't care. It's not a company based on "care".
It's all about crushing the opponent.
They pretend to care in their ads and any information that goes out to the public.
That's their image because enough people buy into it.
Behind the scenes they are unbelievably greedy.
No corporation is based on anything but making money. If Spotify cries foul, it’s to make more money. If Apple discounts its music subscription, it’s ultimately a way to make money. If Apple donates a tiny amount to fire relief or whatever, it’s to make money by burnishing its image as a “good company” and (wait for it) make money.

Don't get me wrong, I love Apple products and services and and have been buying them for decades. But I'm always surprised at how many people take this tribalistic "fanboi" approach and forget that this is a gigantic corporation which exists solely to make money for its shareholders, period.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Expos of 1969
I’ve noticed an inordinate number of posts with this “Apple curation=Apple knows best=Apple’s trying to control my life!!” jibber jabber ever since the end of Apple’s event yesterday

So who’s distributing this talking point? Or maybe y’all are just parroting each other?

It’s rather interesting (at least to me). Spotify? Epic? Both? Neither? Hmmm...


It's self evident, if you can't see it then so be it. Stay comfortable.
 
How is it different than something like Amazon Prime?
Because Apple takes 30% off what Spotify charges. So Apple gets 100% of what it charges plus a 30% extra off Spotify. So in short Apple gets 130% and Spotify only 70%. How can you compete in this scenario?
 
LOL Apple is a 2 trillion dollar company. Your loss of $10 a month would never be noticed. Apple is not a mom & pop company that can't afford to lose one customer.

You’re soooooo cool! So hip. So edgy.:eek:
[automerge]1600285693[/automerge]
You’re better off with Android.

Probably. I could at least play Xbox games while on the go then. UnlikeiPhones.
 
  • Disagree
Reactions: Maconplasma
I have a shared family plan and subscribe individually to Apple Music, Apple Arcade and a 200GB storage plan. Only $3+ savings, but I might get the Apple One. Few bucks savings adds up.
You might also discover that you like some of the other services if there is no barrier to using them. You might not. :)
 
Apple literally does this now in iOS. Firefox and anything chrome engine wise can't be on the store but they have to use webkit.

This situation is obviously very different. Apple manufactures the product and is well within its rights to put its own software on it to the exclusion of anyone else. That's exactly the right of OEMs that Microsoft was found to be impeding.
 
I call everyone to boycott all these horrible companies like Spotify and Epic. Their behaviour is hypocritic and immoral. Desperate for cash that’s all. Hey, let’s work harder on your products and offer something better to convince me to buy your services. That’s how it’s done in the free market. How dare you Apple to bundle your services on your platform that you worked on for so many years. Jesus Christ...
I’ve considered leaving Spotify for Apple Music a couple of times for reasons including paying artists a little more per stream (very little I am aware).

After trialing Apple Music, I much prefer Spotify. My circle of friends are on Spotify so sharing music is convenient that way. My speakers stream directly from Spotify as opposed to streaming Apple Music from my phone (getting interrupted if i were to play a video on social media and poorer audio quality).

I much prefer the content available on Netflix over Apple TV and I don’t use iCloud. So I don’t think I will subscribe to Apple one.

I know my friends are on the same boat as I am. Which makes me genuinely curious as to how many others are in a similar position as I am and will continue subscribing to streaming services outside of Apple. If there are a lot of people like myself, does Spotify really need to worry? Are they over reacting? Publicity stunt? Or something else?
 
  • Like
Reactions: ignatius345
Actually, they cannot. That's why they are being sued.

Just the fact of being sued doesn’t mean that they a) can’t do it or b) that it’s illegal. I could sue you for whatever reason I like, it doesn’t mean it has any standing.

”But Microsoft was sued because they bundled IE with windows!” - that’s an incredibly simplistic and factually incorrect view of what happened. MS was a monopoly in desktop OS‘s which is not in itself illegal. What was illegal was using it’s position to coerce OEM’s to pre-install Windows on their hardware at threat of sanctions which further reinforced their dominance. This bundling of IE was tied to Windows which was tied to the coercive tactics used against OEM’s to have Windows pre-installed on every desktop. Then, IE was given access to undocumented API’s that third parties didn’t have access to and the whole shebang was premeditated.

Apple is vertically integrated which makes a big difference here - they ARE NOT forcing other device manufacturers to preinstall either iOS or any Apple service. There are no coercive tactics being used against any 3rd party. They are not a monopoly in any market that they operate and it is LEGAL/ expected that you have a monopoly on your own products and services.

If Apple wanted, they could bundle all of their services FOR FREE with the hardware and crush the competition and it would still be technically legal.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ravenstar
It's self evident, if you can't see it then so be it. Stay comfortable.
I’d love to hear how Apple is controlling your life, but it doesn’t sound like you’re interested in having a discussion.

If I felt that way, I’d dump them in a second and I sure as hell wouldn’t be posting on an Apple centric forum lol.

That’s what is self-evident to me. But other people have various hobbies. Or jobs lol. Stay edgy 🙂
 
Making it official? Antitrust complaint?

No doubt they’ll complain, but that’s just a bad headline. Should have said voices antitrust complaint, not issues antitrust complaint.

There’s no such thing as issuing an antitrust complaint via a press release. It would be a legal filing with the appropriate governing body.
 
My circle of friends are on Spotify so sharing music is convenient that way. My speakers stream directly from Spotify as opposed to streaming Apple Music from my phone (getting interrupted if i were to play a video on social media and poorer audio quality).

Same. Everyone I know is on Spotify, and the direct streaming it’s super handy. I really appreciate being able to install Spotify on multiple devices and control playback from any of them.
 
Because Apple takes 30% off what Spotify charges. So Apple gets 100% of what it charges plus a 30% extra off Spotify. So in short Apple gets 130% and Spotify only 70%. How can you compete in this scenario?
No, apple doesn’t get 30% of Spotify. Apple gets 15%, and that’s assuming the user signed up through apple.
 
  • The music streaming company beat analysts’ expectations to reach 130 million paid subscribers for its premium service.
  • Premium subscribers rose 31% from a year earlier. Analysts on average were expecting Spotify to have 128.6 million paid subscribers.
Well by your notes Spotify had no reason to throw that knee-jerk reaction yesterday. But they did, so it proves they have more to worry about than you or the rest of us know about.
 
Spotify is in trouble. Not because of Apple's Apple One bundle, but when a company starts looking at how much money they are paying for the access to the platform, and now start whining about it.

another thing you never see from the whiner's community is that Apple's fee from a subscription after the 1st year falls to 15% for the second year and every year after that. But if a company is not willing to give an incentive of a reduced price for a full year commitment, then people will not go for the full year at a time.

I personally was never impressed with Spotify myself. Apple won my business with a good experience, a price break for a full year subscription, and never gave me a reason to cancel it.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.