Sprint and T-Mobile Aiming to Reach Merger Deal Next Week

Discussion in 'iOS Blog Discussion' started by MacRumors, Apr 26, 2018.

  1. MacRumors macrumors bot

    MacRumors

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2001
    #1
    [​IMG]


    Earlier this month, reports suggested Sprint and T-Mobile had once again resumed merger talks, and now it appears the two U.S. carriers may be close to inking a deal.

    According to Reuters, Sprint and T-Mobile have "made progress" negotiating merger terms and are aiming to complete deal talks as soon as next week.

    [​IMG]

    T-Mobile parent company Deutsche Telekom and Sprint parent company SoftBank are said to be discussing an agreement that would "dictate how they exercise voting control over the combined company."
    Previous merger talks between Sprint and T-Mobile failed after the two companies were unable to reach "mutually agreeable terms." Sprint parent company SoftBank was said to be unsatisfied with the deal because of ownership terms, with SoftBank concerned about losing control of the combined company after Deutsche Telekom requested a controlling stake.

    If T-Mobile and Sprint are able to establish a satisfactory deal, the combined company would have more than 100 million customers.

    Sources that spoke to Reuters said there is "no certainty" a deal will be reached, given the dissolution of the previous merger talks.

    Article Link: Sprint and T-Mobile Aiming to Reach Merger Deal Next Week
     
  2. augustrushrox macrumors member

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2015
  3. neoelectronaut macrumors 68030

    neoelectronaut

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2003
    Location:
    Southeastern Louisiana
    #3
    Here's hoping my T-Mobile bill doesn't go up. Loving that $72 a month unlimited for 2 lines.
     
  4. barkomatic macrumors 68040

    Joined:
    Aug 8, 2008
    Location:
    Manhattan
    #4
    On one hand a merger of Spring and T-mobile might combine to make a real competitor to Verizon and AT&T but on the other it would make it easier for the three to collude.

    Sprint may fail eventually anyway though they limp along.
     
  5. EW800 macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2012
  6. lyngo macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Sep 10, 2007
    #6
    This is bad, bad news, I feel for people in the long run.
     
  7. BeforeTheMeds macrumors 6502

    BeforeTheMeds

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2016
    Location:
    Edomx, MX
    #7
    Me too except 2 lines unlimited for 60.00.
     
  8. cmwade77 macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Nov 18, 2008
    #8
    I really hope this falls through and luckily, even if they can ink a deal, the regulators could still block it, here's hoping that they do. This is a bad idea all the way around.
     
  9. michael31986 macrumors 68040

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2008
    #9
    Why would this be bad for consumers. T mobile and Sprint have cheapest rates.
     
  10. neoelectronaut macrumors 68030

    neoelectronaut

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2003
    Location:
    Southeastern Louisiana
    #10
    Dang, nice. The lowest I can manage is $64, and that's if my wife uses less than 2GB of data by some miracle.
     
  11. oldhifi macrumors 65816

    oldhifi

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2013
    Location:
    USA
    #11
    Hopefully they will put up more towers in rural areas..
     
  12. Kingrsmchugh macrumors newbie

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2012
    #12
    I wouldn’t worry to much about competition. In a few years amazon, google and Apple will probably all be carriers.
     
  13. Andres Cantu macrumors 68030

    Andres Cantu

    Joined:
    May 31, 2015
    Location:
    Rio Grande Valley in South Texas
    #13
    If this means better 5G for the future than T-Mobile or Sprint could bring by themselves to their customers, then by all means merge. I suppose a triopoly is better than a duopoly. And there's certainly places in my area where Sprint gets signal and T-Mobile doesn't, and vice-versa.
     
  14. cmwade77 macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Nov 18, 2008
    #14
    Because Sprint has the worst customer service of just about any company I have dealt with (United Airlines takes the cake for the absolute worst though) and it would reduce competition, which will result in them raising prices.
     
  15. MattMJB0188 macrumors 68000

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2009
    #15
    I feel like this is just to "save Sprint" so they don't go bankrupt. T-Mobile is doing exceedingly well now. They don't need Sprint. Not to mention... that's just going to put a really bad taste in people's mouths. Sprint needs to die, period.
     
  16. btrach144 macrumors 65816

    btrach144

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2015
    #16
    Nobody would win in this situation. +1 for T-Mobile doing well enough. Sprint is only going to drag them down.
     
  17. 0007776 Suspended

    0007776

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2006
    Location:
    Somewhere
    #17
    Less competition. The combined company could more easily raise its rates to be comparable to AT&T or Verizon.
     
  18. xero9 macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Nov 7, 2006
    #18
    I used to dread the day as a person who used T-Mobile when visiting the US. Now their PAYG plans stink for short visits. Let the merger take place!
     
  19. radiology macrumors 6502

    radiology

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2014
    Location:
    Westlake, OH
    #19
    This seems like an attempt to put lipstick on a pig (or two in this case).
     
  20. OldSchoolMacGuy Suspended

    OldSchoolMacGuy

    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2008
    #20
    10th times a charm, right?
    --- Post Merged, Apr 26, 2018 ---
    Less competition. Less competition means less incentive for the combined company to offer good rates. They can simply raise their rates to those of AT&T and Verizon. Don't like it? Who else you gonna go to?
     
  21. BasicGreatGuy Contributor

    BasicGreatGuy

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2012
    Location:
    In the middle of several books.
    #21
    Let the free market decide which companies it wishes to use. We don’t need the gubmint stepping in to dictate.

    It’s not like T-Mobile or Sprint towers and service would disappear from a merger.
     
  22. HutNews macrumors newbie

    HutNews

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2017
    Location:
    California
    #22
    Google already is, Facebook next, then Apple
     
  23. PeterL111 macrumors member

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2015
    #23
    Bad idea? I don’t know what Sprint has been doing but whenever I pass by their store, it is often empty. Better a merger than declare bankrupt.
     
  24. UnusedLoginID macrumors member

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2012
    #24
    No, no, no…! Sprint is a big mess, their activation policies are a mess - ever tried switching a Sprint SIM card to a new phone? It never works, you always have to call them! -, they use a technology (CDMA) that’s unique (US only) and proprietary (Qualcomm anyone…?), they’re bleeding money, etc… etc…
    T-Mobile doesn’t know what they’re getting into, the merger will kill them!
    How do we tell Légère that Sprint is a scam?
     
  25. Kpeterk2444 macrumors newbie

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2018
    #25
    I think everyone is missing the point. Sprint has a lot of spectrum assets that can be very useful in deploying 5G networks and competing better with Verizon and AT&T. Regardless of what you think of the anticompetetive aspect, both T-Mobile and Sprint customers would benefit from this. T-Mobile's network would gain the use of extra spectrum for faster data speeds, etc. Sprint customers would benefit from better coverage and a company looking to expand its footprint to better compete in the marketplace.
     

Share This Page