Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
2 independent rumours, unrelated, and the exclusivity just sounds wrong.

There were absolutely firm rumours from reliable Verizon sources that 'Verizon was going to get iPhone in a few months' literally for years before it finally happened. Good sources does not make it happen—just that they're trying.

Rumour 1 — Sounds like the same buy-in any carrier needs to make to get iPhone.

Rumour 2 — WiMax is just too limited a technology to roll out for a flagship phone. There's no evidence WiMax is being adopted more widely.

HSPA+ gets 21mbps, still on 3G (although sometimes called 4G). That'll be enough for the majority of customers.

Apple doesn't bother about specs or bullet points, and it certainly doesn't bother trying to be first at anything but its own technologies—because everyone else's 'first' is usually less well thought out and poorly implemented.

In the case of mobile phones, most of the world is 3G, with a clear plan to move to LTE. Only the US and 'new US' China have major mobile technology schisms. Both big and important markets, but Apple has taken a pretty global approach so far.

As for the iPhone 5 thing. I think we'll all be disappointed on this one. It's a long wait for a 4S, not that it won't be a great phone, as the 3GS is, just that expectations are very high. But expectations have been dashed many times before. Sadly, going by sales and mind-share, no other company is really pressuring Apple to try too hard at this point.

Android is like cheap mp3 players. Apple's happy if people that won't stretch to buy iPhone buy Android, because Apple knows that, after a taste of Android, the next time, they'll buy iPhone. They'll realise it's better value, with a better ecosystem.

And there's a fair bit of evidence that Apple is going to defend its intellectual property, this time around. They just have to show a judge what tablets and phones looked like before iPhone/iPad and what they look like after… it's an open and shut case. Leaving Windows Phone the only competition. Job done.​
 
Taken with a GIANT grain of salt, a poster on another site mentioned that he just got off the phone with sprint, and the tech support rep said that the sprint iphone would support lte and wimax, this might fall in line with a previous macrumors poster mentioning that there was indeed a dual mode chip avaliable now
 
As I think about this, why wouldn't Sprint deserve an exclusive if they promised $20 Billion over a period of years?

Further, if Sprint's WiMax is ready, and the competitors are NOT ready with their comparable offerings, then good for them. Maybe it's Apple's way of pressuring Verizon and AT&T to get with the program and roll-out their upgraded networks at a quicker pace?

Because clearly only ATT deserves an exclusive and Apple not doing that is a slap in the face to all loyalists who will gather together at the top of a large cliff and commit a massive suicide to show Apple they will not stand for such an injustice.

^^^Did I get it right? That seems to be the general consensus in this thread.

IMO Wimax has been cooking for a bit longer than LTE. Makes sense that if Sprint had enough scratch that they could convince Apple to make them a 4G wimax version like the Nexus S 4G for example.

----------

Taken with a GIANT grain of salt, a poster on another site mentioned that he just got off the phone with sprint, and the tech support rep said that the sprint iphone would support lte and wimax, this might fall in line with a previous macrumors poster mentioning that there was indeed a dual mode chip avaliable now

There are dual mode Broadcomm chips but believe me that unless that person somehow got Dan Hesse on the line, that rep was just wishfully thinking.
 
Isn't this about the time, usually the night before an even where the new device gets "leaked"? So where's this years leaked iPhone 5???
 
That's the thing though ... Sprint will not be getting an exclusive on the iPhone 5.

Sprint will get the iPhone 5 with WiMax now, because the technology is ready - now.

Later, AT&T and Verizon will get the iPhone 5 with LTE when the technology is ready. LTE is not deployed enough and the chipsets are not ready yet. In a few months, maybe, but not now.
Exactly!
 
As I think about this, why wouldn't Sprint deserve an exclusive if they promised $20 Billion over a period of years?

Further, if Sprint's WiMax is ready, and the competitors are NOT ready with their comparable offerings, then good for them. Maybe it's Apple's way of pressuring Verizon and AT&T to get with the program and roll-out their upgraded networks at a quicker pace?

But the article says that both Verizon and AT&T were required to make similar commitments but the big deal here is that Sprint is putting itself in a very dangerous position (aka betting the company) whereas AT&T and Verizon can afford it.
 
I think this amount of phone is completely possible for Sprint.... look at what I am saying:

It is estimated that AT&T has about 15million iPhone users (about 15 percent of total subscribers). If Sprint was to gain 8million customers between all carriers they would have about 60million subscribers. If Sprint had about the same percentage, they would have about 10 million iPhones sold in year one. I read somewhere that about 50% of iPhone users upgrade with each release, so year 2 would have another 5 million, year 3 another 5 million, and year 4 would be another 5 million. That is a total of 25 million iPhones sold and that doesn't include any additional growth the iPhone market might take by opening free on contract iPhones (a rumor).

So what I am saying is this "CRAZY" amount of iPhones 30.5 million probably really isn't far off of how many people would actually purchase them. Just my 2 cents!


- Joe
 
I would not be surprised if sprint did obtain exclusivity. but not for the iphone5, but for the "cheap iphone". Sprint has always went after those would wanted to be on a real network, not virgin or boost, but cant afford the upfront fee's verizon and at&t charge if you have less than stellar credit. I see this as a great way for sprint to gain thousands of cheap customers overnight
 
In fact this is what Verizon paid in the end. You have to understand Sprint's position though. They have been losing customers for almost 5 years now due to not having the iPhone. Contrary to what you may read around here Sprint is a very good service. They have had all the latest Android phones but with the iPhone being what it is it didn't matter much. I guess you can say that Android has kept them afloat until now. Even with Android SPring hasn't been able to make a profit since 2006 and they are primed for someone to step in and buy them.

This Apple deal hopefully will become a powerful road to recovery for them. Dan Hesse had to do something. If he let things go as they were going Sprint would probably not survive another 2 years. So yes it's a big scary deal but to win in this business you sometimes have to make some very bold moves and you have to have the balls to do it. Obviously Mr Hesse has the balls to go all in.

I for one hope everything works out for them and that they are around for many years to come.

Sprint isn't losing customers due to the lack of the iPhone. Sprint has lost millions of customers the last few years because for the most part they just plain suck. Verizon just got the iPhone this year and has added customers every quarter for years prior to getting it. The iPhone is a bonus, not the basis for a carriers success. Sprint is all but done.
 
By far this year is the year of iPhone rumors
From not knowing what's coming iPhone 4S or 5
To which carrier is getting it next.

I just hope the carriers in my country gets which ever iPhone is coming tomorrow.

----------

Taken with a GIANT grain of salt, a poster on another site mentioned that he just got off the phone with sprint, and the tech support rep said that the sprint iphone would support lte and wimax, this might fall in line with a previous macrumors poster mentioning that there was indeed a dual mode chip avaliable now
GIANT grain of salt NO, the WHOLE DAMN BOTTLE YES:D
 
Sprint isn't losing customers due to the lack of the iPhone. Sprint has lost millions of customers the last few years because for the most part they just plain suck. Verizon just got the iPhone this year and has added customers every quarter for years prior to getting it. The iPhone is a bonus, not the basis for a carriers success. Sprint is all but done.

At&t has added more customers than Verizon despite an inferior network. If you don't think the iPhone will help Sprint, you aren't paying attention.
 
But the article says that both Verizon and AT&T were required to make similar commitments but the big deal here is that Sprint is putting itself in a very dangerous position (aka betting the company) whereas AT&T and Verizon can afford it.

Does Sprint have a choice though? If they are losing customers at such a high rate as rumored (all because they lack an iPhone offering), then the only solution to stop the bleeding is to bet the farm.
 
Sprint isn't losing customers due to the lack of the iPhone. Sprint has lost millions of customers the last few years because for the most part they just plain suck. Verizon just got the iPhone this year and has added customers every quarter for years prior to getting it. The iPhone is a bonus, not the basis for a carriers success. Sprint is all but done.
I get real tired of people saying Sprint sucks. Look, I've been with them for almost twelve years. I would have left long ago if they sucked. Their service is excellent and they have vastly improved customer service over the years. And yes it is a fact that they lose a percentage of customers every year because they didn't have the iPhone.

Just stop talking out of your ass if you don't know what you're talking about. Yeah they made some bad business decisions but that has nothing to do with how good or bad their service and support is. In case you haven't heard iPhone is the best selling handset on the market and it stands to reason people would jump carriers to get it. I'm sure that if I said something to the effect that no one leaves Sprint just for the iPhone you would be the first one to jump in and prove how wrong I was.
 
I get real tired of people saying Sprint sucks. Look, I've been with them for almost twelve years. I would have left long ago if they sucked. Their service is excellent and they have vastly improved customer service over the years. And yes it is a fact that they lose a percentage of customers every year because they didn't have the iPhone.

Just stop talking out of your ass if you don't know what you're talking about. Yeah they made some bad business decisions but that has nothing to do with how good or bad their service and support is. In case you haven't heard iPhone is the best selling handset on the market and it stands to reason people would jump carriers to get it. I'm sure that if I said something to the effect that no one leaves Sprint just for the iPhone you would be the first one to jump in and prove how wrong I was.

I do know what I'm talking about. Try reading about it yourself. And please tell me why Verizon added customers every quarter for years without the iPhone while Sprint bled subs by the millions during the same time? I'm talking facts which you can easily verify. Your argument has no basis. AT& lost very few customers when Verizon got the iPhone.
 
Fascinating how much jealousy is being revealed by the comments of haters, and others who are not getting their needs met, all because they are emotionally attached to iPhone.

Suggesting Sprint Customers are not as well heeled as AT&T or VZN subscribers is sheer lunacy. That they might have to wait for intrinsic fulfillment they can only get from a phone is sad. One wonders what will become of them a few years from now.
 
At&t has added more customers than Verizon despite an inferior network. If you don't think the iPhone will help Sprint, you aren't paying attention.

Then how did Verizon overtake AT&T in total customers even though AT&T bought Cingular and had a 3 year exclusive on the iPhone? This argument holds no water at all.
 
I get real tired of people saying Sprint sucks. Look, I've been with them for almost twelve years. I would have left long ago if they sucked. Their service is excellent and they have vastly improved customer service over the years. And yes it is a fact that they lose a percentage of customers every year because they didn't have the iPhone.

Thanks for the heads-up. I was on Sprint before going over to T-Mobile 5 years ago (just based on a better price). Never had a problem with Sprint or T-Mobile (friends have had headaches with Verizon and AT&T).

Since T-Mobile will probably end up as a part of AT&T, will get the Sprint iPhone.... :D
 
Sprint finale [fi'na-lee]

If you have ever had the misfortune to visit the "Sprint web site" you will understand why Sprint will go out of business within the next few years.

They do not understand.
The people are rude.
The site is 20th century, to "nauseous offal"....lol...
Apple will make of with their $20 billion....Sprint will be the first carrier of the 21st century to get buried!
Never! NEVER! Bet the farm on anything. Especially if you don't know what you are doin in the first place......

Personally, I would not accept an iPhone 5 for free, with free service included also, from Sprint.....they are clueless and would only complicate my life in the short term; ruin my communication needs in the long term.
I hope I am wrong, unemployment is high enough these days. ....lol....
 
Just a Minute!

We should just make a poll, so when they announce what ever they annouce tommorrow, i's easier o see who was right :D


The Sprint exclusivity could be for iPhone5 the cheaper 16GB version for $199.00, while 32GB and 64Gb for $299.00 and $399.00 respectively could be available with ATT and Verizon !!

May be I am right !
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.