Hopefully Apple goes with HSPA/LTE in their notebooks. Especially considering they are doing this with the iPhone.
Global coverage today.
Proven higher speeds at cell edge.
Amazing long range rural coverage capabilities.
14.4Mbit today. (active throughout my whole country)
40+Mbit 2008 (already being trialled in my state)
100+Mbit downlink / 50Mbit uplink with LTE (2009)
Seamless handing over between the whole LTE/HSPA+/HSDPA/UMTS/EDGE/GPRS family of technologies.
AT&T and Verizon are the carriers supporting this in the US.
All correct... I don't understand WTF the deal is with WIMAX? I mean come on... All the info I have found quotes speeds of 2-3 megabits / sec. 2-3mbps?? Thats it ? For a next generation wireless network??? I just dont get it. 4G/LTE will blow this out of the water!
Can you link to something that backs this up? Unless they've moved the CN tower to Luxembourg I don't think there's anywhere in the world that has the theoretical maximum HSPA rate across the whole country. Higher speeds at cell edge is only interesting if we know the cell size... HSPA is a GSM technology so the cells are rather small compared to WiMAX. LTE is still being argued in committee.
Granted all my information is from US centric sources-- I'd be interested in anything you can send our way.
I'm almost positive that Australia has 14.4mbps HSDPA across like 98% of the population. Also many Nordic countries have at least some form of HSDPA across the vast majority of their population. Not to mention Asia....
I would like your comment in response to what I wrote to the poster above.. Why is everyone infatuated with WIMAX? I understand the coverage area is greater than UMTS/HSPA, but with speeds of 2-3mbps for a next gen wireless network??? Couldn't the USA in particular rollout HSPA/HSPA+/HSOPA on the 700mhz freq and get close to the same transceiver/km^2 as WIMAX?
Does anyone else know the answer to this?