Become a MacRumors Supporter for $25/year with no ads, private forums, and more!
  • Did you order new AirTags? We've opened a dedicated AirTags forum.

thatoneguy82

macrumors 68000
Original poster
Jul 23, 2008
1,895
2
Beach Cities, CA
So, the price drop on Amazon in that the Crucial m4 SATA III is much cheaper than the Intel SATA II. My MBP is only capable of SATA II. Would I be able to use a SATA III drive instead?
 

thatoneguy82

macrumors 68000
Original poster
Jul 23, 2008
1,895
2
Beach Cities, CA
Comment
Nov 28, 2010
22,670
28
located
Thanks! Is it "better" to use the SATA III than the SATA II even though it doesn't support it?

I don't know, but since S-ATA is backwards compatible, and I employ the same reason as you, having an SSD for a future Mac with S-ATA 6.0 Gbps (S-ATA III) interface, why not do it.
I get the same read and write speeds with this S-ATA 6.0 Gbps (S-ATA III) SSD as I got with the previous S-ATA 3.0 Gbps (S-ATA II) SSD (Vertex 2, now in my iMac with S-ATA 3.0 Gbps (S-ATA II) interface), though I think it is a bit faster, but that may be just an illusion or wishful thinking. It still suffices my needs.
 
Comment
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.