You can figure out that the TBW is nowhere near 150 TB because your system is going to report between 0% to 2% used. If it was 150 TBW it would be at 15% used.
Exactly. As I have been saying from nearly the beginning you have to look at
all the data: percentage used as well as what had been written to the SSD.
In an early video, (
Apple M1 SSDs: Do We Have a PROBLEM?), they have actual equations (
10:12 and and
10:38) which are ...
linear equations.
For those who, for some silly reason, want to point to wikipedia read
Wikipedia is not a reliable source: "Because it can be edited by anyone at any time, any information it contains at a particular time could be
vandalism, a work in progress, or
just plain wrong. (...) Wikipedia is a volunteer-run project, it cannot constantly monitor every contribution. There are many errors that remain unnoticed for hours, days, weeks, months, or even years. Therefore,
Wikipedia should not be considered a definitive source in and of itself"
That is why I have avoided using wikipedia and instead used the 2014 test, which since it was published in a recognized reliable source would overrule wikipedia per their
Reliable sources guidelines - yes the youtube would not qualify but they don't use wikepdia either because...
Wikipedia is not a reliable source.
In fact,
Apple M1 SSDs: Do We Have a PROBLEM? specifically refers back to that test clearly using the linear results of that test for their formulas
- Introducing the SSD Endurance Experiment and related pages.
The back of an envelope equation I came up with was TB*100/percentage = TBW and here is the work to get to that overly simple equation:
Base formula: TB/TBWx100 = percentage.
TB = percentage/100 * TBW
TB/(percentage/100) = TBW
Assume the 23.5 TB has 2% that would result in a nice healthy ~1,175 (23.5*100/2) for the
warranted lifespan.