A apple.snapple macrumors regular Original poster Jun 3, 2014 205 3 Mar 9, 2015 #1 I was dead set on getting the SS until this picture from The Verge... I thought it had an oleophobic coating. Guess not....
I was dead set on getting the SS until this picture from The Verge... I thought it had an oleophobic coating. Guess not....
profmjh macrumors 68000 Mar 7, 2015 1,734 1,801 UK Mar 9, 2015 #2 apple.snapple said: Image I was dead set on getting the SS until this picture from The Verge... I thought it had an oleophobic coating. Guess not.... Click to expand... I've seen similar pictures and it really put me off.
apple.snapple said: Image I was dead set on getting the SS until this picture from The Verge... I thought it had an oleophobic coating. Guess not.... Click to expand... I've seen similar pictures and it really put me off.
saving107 macrumors 603 Oct 14, 2007 6,384 33 San Jose, Ca Mar 9, 2015 #3 apple.snapple said: I was dead set on getting the SS until this picture from The Verge... I thought it had an oleophobic coating. Guess not.... Click to expand... Same here, I don't mind spending the $599 and the sapphire is what is making consider the upgrade from Aluminum, but all those fingerprints is such a turn off.
apple.snapple said: I was dead set on getting the SS until this picture from The Verge... I thought it had an oleophobic coating. Guess not.... Click to expand... Same here, I don't mind spending the $599 and the sapphire is what is making consider the upgrade from Aluminum, but all those fingerprints is such a turn off.
sk8mash macrumors 6502a Dec 1, 2007 953 110 England Mar 9, 2015 #4 If you've ever owned a stainless steel watch you'll know its no biggie.
D darngooddesign macrumors P6 Jul 4, 2007 18,790 10,739 Atlanta, GA Mar 9, 2015 #5 That side is usually against your wrist so I doubt it's an issue.
Lobwedgephil macrumors 603 Apr 7, 2012 5,795 4,768 Mar 9, 2015 #6 Yeah, I hate looking at the back of my watch and seeing fingerprints.