A apple.snapple macrumors regular Original poster Mar 9, 2015 #1 I was dead set on getting the SS until this picture from The Verge... I thought it had an oleophobic coating. Guess not....
I was dead set on getting the SS until this picture from The Verge... I thought it had an oleophobic coating. Guess not....
profmjh macrumors 68000 Mar 9, 2015 #2 apple.snapple said: Image I was dead set on getting the SS until this picture from The Verge... I thought it had an oleophobic coating. Guess not.... Click to expand... I've seen similar pictures and it really put me off.
apple.snapple said: Image I was dead set on getting the SS until this picture from The Verge... I thought it had an oleophobic coating. Guess not.... Click to expand... I've seen similar pictures and it really put me off.
saving107 macrumors 603 Mar 9, 2015 #3 apple.snapple said: I was dead set on getting the SS until this picture from The Verge... I thought it had an oleophobic coating. Guess not.... Click to expand... Same here, I don't mind spending the $599 and the sapphire is what is making consider the upgrade from Aluminum, but all those fingerprints is such a turn off.
apple.snapple said: I was dead set on getting the SS until this picture from The Verge... I thought it had an oleophobic coating. Guess not.... Click to expand... Same here, I don't mind spending the $599 and the sapphire is what is making consider the upgrade from Aluminum, but all those fingerprints is such a turn off.
sk8mash macrumors 6502a Mar 9, 2015 #4 If you've ever owned a stainless steel watch you'll know its no biggie.
D darngooddesign macrumors Core Mar 9, 2015 #5 That side is usually against your wrist so I doubt it's an issue.
Lobwedgephil macrumors 603 Mar 9, 2015 #6 Yeah, I hate looking at the back of my watch and seeing fingerprints.