I've got a bad feeling about this.
We're gonna need a bigger Blockade Runner!
I've got a bad feeling about this.
Oh man I see we have ye 'ol Star Trek whiners on these forums too. The Tea Party of nerds.
Reality check grandpas, JJ Abram's Star Trek took a dead franchise (previous 2 films flopped a decade earlier and the last TV series was cancelled after its second season) and transformed it into a critical and commercial blockbuster. Trek '09 is the best reviewed film of the entire movie series (95% on RT) and the most successful up to that point. The sequel, while not as strong but still well regarded (87% RT), made close to half a billion dollars. Get over yourselves, and the irrelevant bubble you live in.
In reality Star Wars 7 has a good shot at greatness. Because Abrams is a great director. But hey, random posters at an internet forum know so much more about good directors than say, Steven Speilberg, who's a fan Abram's work.
This is why I rarely contribute to Internet forums. It's the bottom feeding ghetto of the internet.
If I see a single lens flare I'm going to throw my computer out the window and burn my house down.
Box office predictions for this movie?
EDIT: One thing I hate about the new star treks is that Kirk is a womanizer. The original Kirk wasn't a womanizer. He frequently had romantic interests, but wasn't a sleep with her and leave her type of guy like Chris Pine's Kirk.
Who cares? Everything evolves. Humans evolve. Art evolve. Tastes evolve. Culture evolves.ST '09 may be a good movie, but it is not really Star Trek as Roddenberry originally envisioned it. The whole franchise drifted away from his vision as early as the final years of TNG.
I watched about 5 seconds, skipping through scenes, and was 110% clear it was homemade, and really bad at that even. Why spread lies?
*Fourth season. Four terrible, terrible seasons. Taking Star Trek out of Rick Berman's hands was a very wise decision.(…and the last TV series was cancelled after its second season) …
I've got a bad feeling about this.
the movie features actors like Andy Serkis, Daisy Ridley, Adam Driver, Domhnall Gleeson, Gwendoline Christie, Lupita Nyong'o, and Oscar Issac
Who cares? Everything evolves. Humans evolve. Art evolve. Tastes evolve. Culture evolves.
The problem I have with them is the ridiculous caricatures of the original characters. They were bad enough in TOS, why make them even worse?Yeah, everything changes, and not always for the better.
Like I already said, if you like JJA's Star Trek movies then good for you, they can stand on their own as movies. Just don't get the idea that they are Star Trek as Roddenberry envisioned it.
I'll say this much, ST '09 was closer to Star Trek than some of the later TV series. Not bad for someone who claims he isn't even a fan of Star Trek!
And that has what to do with an entirely different movie with a different studio behind it?
Same studio for both, Bad Robot.
JJ Abrams work is recognizeable and it sucks. Though less nauseating than Michael Bay's recent flicks. Either would stain a Starwars film.
George Lucas took care of that with the last 3 films.JJ injected a good dose of suckery into the Star Trek franchise.
I'm sure he'll FUBAR Star Wars just as well.
Who? Never heard of any of them.… Andy Serkis, Daisy Ridley, Adam Driver, Domhnall Gleeson, Gwendoline Christie, Lupita Nyong'o, and Oscar Issac…
That's one of the production companies behind it, not really a studio. As in Disney is behind Star Wars now, while Paramount is behind Star Trek.