Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Steve Jobs was a visionary and what Apple needed after the Gil Amelio debacle, but the best CEO Apple has ever had is Tim Cook.

Putting aside the fact Steve actually created the company; Steve Jobs took a bankrupt company and made it one of the most important companies on the planet, while cook just 'inherited' an enormous, prestigious, trend-setter, well positioned company (mostly thanks to Jobs) and just grew it bigger. Who's the better CEO?
 
Remember the "I Am Rich" app, which did nothing but was priced at $999.99? Good times. :D

I_Am_Rich_sale_screen.png
Lol, didn’t a couple people end up actually buying it before it was pulled?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Frank Dalton
I disagree. I think it was deliberate misinformation.

There’s no way Apple developed the entire App Store in the short space between the quote you mention and the release of the App Store.

Jobs was a true marketing and sales genius, as well as a brilliant businessman. He also knew how to make people think what he wanted them to think.

The App Store has revolutionised the software industry.
 
It was actually a good thing for Apple to dismiss Steve Jobs way back. That opened the door for him to start NeXT and bring in all that C++ and WebObjects with it when he came back and NeXT laid the groundworks for OS X. If Steve stayed on and never left, Apple might be history or owned by MS by now and the product lineup still be beige and we would all still be using flip phones.
 
i remember watching one of the first presentations to developers on it, and he said there weren't going to be third party apps on the iphone, or rather, they would be webapps, and talked about support for them to *look* native. Even through a video stream you could tell the atmosphere in that room got very cold. After all it's not as if people hadn't been writing Symbian apps for years, running apps on a phone wasn't actually a new thing, and it was shocking if the iPhone wasn't going to allow it. The reality distortion field definitely flickered. Not very long after, the app store was announced. That was one he got wrong. But he could tell when he got something wrong, and was able to turn the ship around onto a new course.

It would be fun to reread forum postings from that era, from Apple followers arguing that third parties should not be allowed to create native iPhone applications. Most likely because that's what Apple said at the time, so those posters must follow. And when Apple's position changes, so do the poster's arguments.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Frank Dalton
I think he meant, "I didn't expect it to be that big." He was very cautious about the whole project. He insisted on the tight controls.
 
  • Like
Reactions: clauzzz203
The best CEO Apple ever had and will have. Unlike a certain bean counter, you can really hear the passion when he talks.

Irrefutable given he made $1 a year. :)
[doublepost=1532559708][/doublepost]
What reasons do you have for stating that Cook is a terrible CEO?

(BTW, I am not the poster saying Cook is terrible - I don't think he is terrible.) IMO, the main issue Tim has based on what's happened with Apple's products is unlike Steve, he's not an actual user. So he can't make judgement calls of what makes a good product and instead delegates. Then it's up to the VPs to decide what makes a good product (or "marketing", like Apple now asking professionals what they want). That's fairly typical for companies, but for special companies the CEO actually knows himself what makes a good product.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Well I know many not going to believe what I’m saying but around early 2010 I was dating this guy who worked on the first iPhone and he said the App Store was ready for iPhone 2G but the upper management decided to delay the release until the next iPhone. He was never given a clear reason why but maybe this explains it.
 
I hated the very idea of it when it was first introduced. Sounded like a useless middle man and and just more "Nannying".
I was wrong.
I see the value of it now in creating standards and helping protect us from "wild west" downloads full of spyware, viruses, trojans, etc. And there is the convenience of one stop shopping for Apps.

As usual, Jobs was right most of the time.
 
  • Like
Reactions: clauzzz203
Cool. Now where is the App Store for HomePod?

Even the lowly Apple TV has third-party apps now, so you'd think a sophisticated machine like HomePod would have a way for developers to hook into its capabilities.
 
Cool. Now where is the App Store for HomePod?

Even the lowly Apple TV has third-party apps now, so you'd think a sophisticated machine like HomePod would have a way for developers to hook into its capabilities.
I'm curious. What apps would be able to be on HomePod? I guess Amazon Music and Google Music but I'm not sure what else.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.