Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I wonder if this "demo" was before or after they changed the screen from plastic to glass. Based on the timeline and the result... I'd wager the former.
 
  • Like
Reactions: manu chao
Steve was a visionary, but all visionaries have their era.. If Steve was still here you probably wouldn't have the Watch, the Apple pencil, mouse feature in iPads, thicker phones with a decent battery etc..
 
At the time I had no interest in Apple products at all. Owned zero. Had no idea about this event. Only knew about it through some websites I frequented like Tom's Hardware etc and I remember reading comments under the news 99.9% was negative. Extremely.
- There's no 3G
- There's no keyboard
- There's no apps

So this piqued my interest so I searched and found the Macworld video just to had a laugh.. and I was blown away! I was thinking.. what kind of idiots I was associated with? They couldn't see the potential of THIS PHONE!

Little by little I sold or got rid of my PC, Palm, and Windows phone to get Apple products.
 
I believe the Ceramic Shield hype. I dropped my 12 Pro Max face down on the supermarket floor on Saturday morning and there isn’t even so much as a scuff. It’s a really well built device.
It’s the same reason why people get ceramic coating on their cars. It doesn’t stop everything but for the abuse a phone would receive it does quite a bit.
 
Does it really matter? :)
Actually, yeah. I mean if someone is composing a main page post, it should at least be as accurate as possible. It's like when I see an article about the latest Tesla Model S updates, and they show a stock pic of a pre-2016 Tesla with the black oval bumper insert. I think "really?" It's not like a pic of the actual item of interest is hard to find.
 
I remember lamenting how far behind Japan the US was in mobile phone technology at the time, and just being excited that iPhone gave US consumers a device that was about as capable as what Japan already had.

The capabilities of the original iPhone weren't that spectacular, really. It really was only the 3 things Jobs claimed it was: a good phone, an iPod, and an internet communication device. The multitouch screen leveled it up against what else was out there, and pulling up the NYTimes website in all its glory was slick, but it was still fairly evolutionary in the broader scheme of things.

It was opening the SDK, and the AppStore that turned it into a phenomenon. Something Jobs was, at least publicly, resistant to. "There's an app for that" is what separated iPhone from the rest of the mobile phone world.
Remember how often it was proclaimed that the iPhone needed a TV tuner because so many Japanese phones had them? Or at minimum a radio tuner? And how without them the Japanese just would never buy it…
 
The one they announced also had a plastic screen
Did you mean the original iPhone? It has glass. It was a last minute change when Jobs was annoyed that the plastic screen got scratches from his keys. Foxconn had to wakeup their workers at night to replace the already produced iPhones' screens.
 
  • Like
Reactions: manu chao
I remember lamenting how far behind Japan the US was in mobile phone technology at the time, and just being excited that iPhone gave US consumers a device that was about as capable as what Japan already had.

The capabilities of the original iPhone weren't that spectacular, really. It really was only the 3 things Jobs claimed it was: a good phone, an iPod, and an internet communication device. The multitouch screen leveled it up against what else was out there, and pulling up the NYTimes website in all its glory was slick, but it was still fairly evolutionary in the broader scheme of things.

It was opening the SDK, and the AppStore that turned it into a phenomenon. Something Jobs was, at least publicly, resistant to. "There's an app for that" is what separated iPhone from the rest of the mobile phone world.
It's not about the capabilities, it's about the human interface. Same reason iPhones have also always been better than technically more capable Android competitors.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TGM85
I was wondering the same thing. I feel like people underestimate how great Tim Apple has done as a CEO. Sure he doesn’t have the flair for theater like SJ did (who does) but his work as logistics head and then/now CEO have resulted in a Herculean bedrock from which the next generation of leaders in the company can confidently operate.
Cause most of us don't care about Apple maximizing profits, we care about them making great new products.
 
Did you mean the original iPhone? It has glass. It was a last minute change when Jobs was annoyed that the plastic screen got scratches from his keys. Foxconn had to wakeup their workers at night to replace the already produced iPhones' screens.
Yea so this demo would have had plastic
 
The original iPhone was fully aluminum/plastic, and I think the prototype used plastic screen (the change to glass, now known as gorilla glass, was a last minute change when Jobs was annoyed how his iPhone screen got scratches from his keys). Obviously it would survive.

The current iPhone has glass front and back. As we all know, glass is glass. Also, the added weight will create more force when dropped, vs the much lighter original iPhone. (original iPhone weighs just 135gm).
This doesn’t require conjecture. There are numerous drop tests you can go find for the new iPhones 13. Pretty sure they have the one of the best durability and drop performance of any previous iPhone design. They have come a LONG way since the original iPhone. The original iPhone, even with a plastic screen, was not invincible and does seem like a pretty ballsy move by Jobs to chuck it in a room full of skeptical journalists wondering about its durability.
 
The most successful electronic product in history. It has become the technology equivalent of crack cocaine.
It scares me that my 4, pre-high school, kids are all asking when they'll be old enough to get their own.
Strange to think that Jobs had to sell it to anyone when first introduced.
Funny that I never owned a smart phone. Although I do own an iPad Pro. It does everything an iphone does, except making a real phone call.

For the phone, I just got a flip phone. Really cheap. 20 bucks for the device and 20 bucks every 3 months to keep the service running. Yeach, it can’t do YouTube, web browsing, facetime or GPS. But for just making phone calls and texting, it’s is good enough for me.
 
Golly does time fly. Those old Jobs keynotes were like major sporting events for us nerds. If you watch the OG iPhone announcement you can see someone down front literally stand up and fist pump when Jobs says “these are not 3 separate products…”

Heres to the crazy ones.
I still watch every keynote but the sheer excitement for the Jobs presentations just show how great a salesman he was.

Stay hungry, stay foolish
 
It's not about the capabilities, it's about the human interface. Same reason iPhones have also always been better than technically more capable Android competitors.

Like I said, the multi-touch put it incrementally above its peers, but that only set it up to have better pan and zoom on the web and gave it more screen real estate than a physical keyboard would allow.

Opening it up to devs as a platform made it what it is.
 
  • Like
Reactions: orbital~debris
I remember lamenting how far behind Japan the US was in mobile phone technology at the time, and just being excited that iPhone gave US consumers a device that was about as capable as what Japan already had.

The capabilities of the original iPhone weren't that spectacular, really. It really was only the 3 things Jobs claimed it was: a good phone, an iPod, and an internet communication device. The multitouch screen leveled it up against what else was out there, and pulling up the NYTimes website in all its glory was slick, but it was still fairly evolutionary in the broader scheme of things.

I was going to make a different point, but THIS is actually the way more interesting story. It's actually hard not to understate just how far behind Japan not only the US but the entire WORLD was when it came to mobile phones/communications when the iPhone was introduced in 2007. Phones that were more mobile personal computers with advanced email & messaging? Check. 3G (which the iPhone wouldn't get for another year)? Check. Mobile music player, rudimentary video playback and even TV tuning, check. Competent (for a phone) Cameras (3MP+)? Check. Mobile Payments (which wouldn't come to iPhone/see widespread US adoption until 2014!)? Check. Mobile gaming? Check. Push notifications for email/messaging? Check. Coming to Japan (from the US) in the early - mid aughts was literally like being transported into an alternate future of mobile phone technology.

What's even more astonishing is that Apple, initially missing so many features these phones had, managed to absolutely crush the domestic phone market in Japan after just a few short years, and to this day holds majority marketshare here (52.6% in 2020 according to IDC), while most Japanese phone manufacturers now don't even crack double digits in their home market.

The magnitude of the failure by Japanese companies to translate their technological leadership into marketshare overseas, or even the ability to maintain market supremacy at home was and still a striking/colossal failure of imagination/business management on their part, and a testament to just how amazing Apple truly was under Steve.

It was opening the SDK, and the AppStore that turned it into a phenomenon. Something Jobs was, at least publicly, resistant to. "There's an app for that" is what separated iPhone from the rest of the mobile phone world.

While I don't completely disagree with this, I think it disregards the importance of just how revolutionary the software stack/multitouch interface were at the time. Looking at the Japanese market, Apple demonstrated that you can have all the features in the world, but if you're UI/software stack is poor, you're likely to have the rug pulled out by a competitor that can create a device people actually want to use. Steve may have initially been wrong about a few things (the App Store most prominently,) but he got the most important parts of the initial release right and was willing to have his mind changed on the rest. Oh, and he was also a master salesman, the reality distortion field was real.

I miss Steve's Apple. It wasn't perfect but the vision, passion, simplicity, and salesmanship Steve brought to/enabled at Apple (along with his ability to balance conflicting personalities and not let any of them dominate too heavily) is something I really hope Apple can regain/refocus on at some point. The Apple of today may be profitable, but I doubt it could pull off the kind of coup Steve's Apple did on the Japanese phone manufacturers...[/QUOTE]
 
Last edited:
I rewatched the iPhone 2G announcement from 2007 which in my opinion is the most iconic moment in tech history, when you consider how we have changed from conventional laptops and PCs to being able to carry a computer around with us in our pocket. That announcement was the beginning of that era. When I rewatched it, Steve convinced me to change the ringtone on my iPhone to Marimba, such an iconic ringtone. RIP Steve, you are greatly missed.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.