Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
What? You're telling me the guy who dated Kathy Griffin and did Dancing with the Stars is making money off of his name and notoriety. Is anyone really surprised that he isn't ashamed of this?

Dancing with the Stars is my favorite show and remember that we all own a lot to the person you called ‘this guy’. He is a big genius and made many great things for the country. My full support 2 Woz.
 
Doesn’t it make you mad though to realize that we’re paying 1,000s of dollars to have a professor teach us who’s less committed and cares less about what he teaches than some random guy on YouTube who teaches much more clearly and effectively for FREE? If I’m paying $4000 a semester to attend school, I expect the university to put $4,000 worth of effort into MY success. It’s what I’m paying them to do. It doesn’t happen.
 
You could most likely get better education in Udemy. Just got to pick the right instructors, and wait for their $10 sale.
Exactly. During the last Udemy sale I picked up a ton of courses at $10/ea. Stuff that I won't have time to look at for a long time, but the content is thorough and well presented to make it easy to learn.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Reactions: pweicks
Nope, nothing fishy. Standard stuff. Name and likeness for cash is standard stuff.

This isn't the perfume business. And it's also not a matter of taste, like 'yeah, this looks good, let me just endorse that brand.' Education and teaching is something completely different. Being an authority on the subject you would have to be a complete ******* or extremely desperate to put your name on a random program without making sure you have a say in the matter.
 
  • Like
Reactions: haruhiko
We are brainwashed into thinking there's only one way to learn: our "educational" institutions. And, if you aren't adept at learning in that way, well then, you're stupid (sorry, learning impaired), i.e. it's *your* fault. In reality, the only way to learn is the way that works for *you*, and our "school" systems are just one option, and not a very good one these days.
 
  • Like
Reactions: pweicks
We are brainwashed into thinking there's only one way to learn: our "educational" institutions. And, if you aren't adept at learning in that way, well then, you're stupid (sorry, learning impaired), i.e. it's *your* fault. In reality, the only way to learn is the way that works for *you*, and our "school" systems are just one option, and not a very good one these days.

Couldn’t have said it better. Beautiful.
 
We are brainwashed into thinking there's only one way to learn: our "educational" institutions. And, if you aren't adept at learning in that way, well then, you're stupid (sorry, learning impaired), i.e. it's *your* fault. In reality, the only way to learn is the way that works for *you*, and our "school" systems are just one option, and not a very good one these days.

But this isn't a school. Whether you're largely self-taught or not, spending five figures of money at an institution with such poor regulations and with the namesake not even feeling responsible for quality just seems like a terrible idea.

You don't have to go to a university to learn CS/SEng (in fact, I find that alumni are often poor programmers in practice because they lack, well, practice), but Woz U seems like a fairly poor substitute.
 
Our society has had it drilled into our heads that we’re gonna be failures if we don’t go to school. That’s so old fashioned. We have all the information in the world available to us in our pockets. Even just YouTube alone can teach you anything you want to know if you’re willing to put in the effort. Oh and I forgot to mention, it’s free! I think there are few systems in this world that are as corrupt as the college/university system in America, considering how much money people put into it and how little they get out of it. I hope that the collegiate system of America burns. That won’t happen until people realize how much they’re being ripped off though.

Would you trust a surgeon who learned how to cut from watching some YouTube videos?

College and its associated degrees serve many purposes beyond just stuffing information into students' heads, but that information is often broader and deeper than what you'll get online for free - especially for advanced programs that you absolutely do need if you want to get hired - or to keep your current job. My wife, at the Director level in a prominent hospital system, was told that if she expected to keep her job, she needed to go back and get a Masters. That's what the company requires because a degree tells the company that you know your stuff. They don't want to deal with candidates who simply say "Oh, just trust me. I can't prove I know anything, but I watched a ton of YouTube."

The college/university system is a total mess, I agree. It's a travesty that profits have been put above educating students, even at schools that are federally funded. It's sickening that at a lot of schools, especially here in Texas, the goddamn football program gets more funding than any ten other programs combined. But those problems aren't solved by burning down the system and eliminating formal education altogether. I mean, they are, but it's the perfect example of throwing out the baby with the bathwater.
 
  • Like
Reactions: nwcs
OK now hold on buddy. Either you call it "Woz U", in which case you are very much front and center of any and all aspects of Woz U. Or call it something different.
[doublepost=1538413812][/doublepost]

It's a bit sad. As far as I can tell, his last big hurrah was ADB, which was great for its time but irrelevant in the 1990s.

He helped support a company that would take a MacBook, remove the screen and install a touchscreen and stylus back in the mid '00s, at a cost of about $3500 or more each. It was quickly killed when the iPad was released. The guy will back any company willing to pay him money.
 
  • Like
Reactions: haruhiko
He helped support a company that would take a MacBook, remove the screen and install a touchscreen and stylus back in the mid '00s, at a cost of about $3500 or more each. It was quickly killed when the iPad was released. The guy will back any company willing to pay him money.

Yeah, he had his weird share of vanity projects. Wheels of Zeus (get it? get it? cause the initials spell out his… oh never mind) comes to mind.
[doublepost=1538424193][/doublepost]
Would you trust a surgeon who learned how to cut from watching some YouTube videos?

The thing is that medicine is a trade that has been tuned and reviewed over and over for millennia. Software engineering is barely half a century old.

Given two people of the same age, one with a master's degree in computer science and one self-taught but having spent the same time actually writing software, I wouldn't blindly trust the degree holder to do a better job writing software. I would not. They do have a higher chance of understanding some theoretical concepts like data structures, but odds are they can't even use version control — because they never had to, and because their school failed to teach them.
 
This isn't the perfume business. And it's also not a matter of taste, like 'yeah, this looks good, let me just endorse that brand.' Education and teaching is something completely different. Being an authority on the subject you would have to be a complete ******* or extremely desperate to put your name on a random program without making sure you have a say in the matter.
I hate to throw cold water on your "education and teaching is something completely different" ideal, but higher education has been viewed as nothing more than a revenue generator for quite some time... turning out debt laden youth by the millions. Like it or not, higher education is a "bidness". Some people's names and reputations are businesses as well.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I hate to throw cold water on your "education and teaching is something completely different" ideal, but higher education has been viewed as nothing more than a revenue generator for quite some time.

That's a very simplistic and in many cases untrue view.

Skyrocketing costs aside, higher education still fulfills useful purposes for many professions. Software engineering just may not be one of them.
 
Nope, there are no, or at least no more than I can count on one hand, famous people in tech or Hollywood that do that, its all for the money. Anyway, once Woz was paid, there is nothing he can do as he was nothing more than a paid actor.

People can and are paid every day to say things on TV, the internet, and in print that are not true and they don't have any qualms about it. After all they have expenses too and they must have a core competency to look or sound truthful even if they are not. You need to understand that being something or saying something that is not true is a highly valued skill in both politics and Hollywood.
Oh I understand that. I’m just a bit surprised in this particular instance Woz got involved in something like this and went on his merry way.

I’ve seen the flip side, too. There’s one celebrity I knew of, because some people I know worked for her on a project almost 20 years ago, who worked her butt off sweating the details on this project that had her name attached to it. She did so because her name was attached and she had personal pride and integrity. I can’t speak for any other aspects of her life. There has been a lot of nasty gossip about her over her divorces. But in this one thing that I do know about, she did her best to do the right thing. She was as kind and earnest in the endeavor as she was beautiful. She still is beautiful. She was a “supermodel” in an era when models actually looked good and didn’t look starved and traumatized by fashion so hideous it can never be unseen. :eek:

Anyway, I was impressed she was more than the pretty face she was known as.

My sister-in-law also worked for a charity a celebrity was affiliated with. Again, there was pride and dedication involved on the part of this actor and his friends who lent their time and fame.

So it does happen, that people do try to be selective about what they attach their name and reputation to and work to ensure it all stays positive.
 
Is there really though? Not to disparage but basically Woz has his name, likeness, and connection to Apple to use as a commodity. The further away we get from his actual Apple involvement, the less value that commodity has. There a whole generation who only recognize Woz from Dancing with the Stars.:eek:


I think you're romanticizing this a bit too much. Just my opinion but Woz's legacy was cemented long ago. History, for better or worse, will view him as co-founder of Apple. Full stop. Woz U will no more affect his legacy than his stint on DWTS.

But he’s become quite the odd duck over the years.
Wasn't he always?[/QUOTE]
I guess I assumed he made wise investments over the years or hired someone to make them on his behalf.

And yeah it’s one thing to become an odd duck dating Kathy Griffin and going on DWTS, but it’s quite another to take hard earned money from ordinary people and not ensuring that they get what is promised under his name, namely an education in a field for which he is an icon. He’s not exactly endorsing $8 body wash.
 
You don’t need to pay for formal education in IT. The only industries that require payment as those with high regulations or self protection ie. medicine, law, pharmacy etc.
 
Like many celebrities he selling/renting out his name for others to use and bring in customers.

Just like celebrities that have their names slapped on articles of clothing and getting paid off. they do not have anything to do with the actual manufacturing of the product. they occasionally get paid for showing up for the one-off marketing events that often have invited tame reporters.

Only when people stop falling for and buying stuff that celebrities endorse will this kind of behavior stop.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.