Supposedly ATI's HD 7000 Series is going to bring PCI-Express 3.0 support.
Yeah, that seems likely. nVidia's Kepler BBQs (600 series) will likely follow
Supposedly ATI's HD 7000 Series is going to bring PCI-Express 3.0 support.
I lean toward nVidia cards personally. Though for more instant gratification, HD 7000 is rumored to be released later this year instead of 2012.Yeah, that seems likely. nVidia's Kepler BBQs (600 series) will likely follow![]()
I lean toward nVidia cards personally. Though for more instant gratification, HD 7000 is rumored to be released later this year instead of 2012.
...and by not making minor, cheap adjustments to the product, they drive sales volume down even lower.
Motherboards are cheap to design and build - proven by the variety and frequency of updated boards from the board makers.
If I were suspicious, I'd think that Apple is trying to create the situation where the Mac Pro is killed for low sales.
...and by not making minor, cheap adjustments to the product, they drive sales volume down even lower.
Motherboards are cheap to design and build - proven by the variety and frequency of updated boards from the board makers.
If I were suspicious, I'd think that Apple is trying to create the situation where the Mac Pro is killed for low sales.
What is the point in designing a Mac Pro for it to be changed again in three months????
Motherboard makers make loads of boards because they make profit on them, simple as that. The Mac Pro market is MUCH MUCH MUCH smaller than that of the Enthusiast market, hence R&D costs are significant.
Absolutely no point in releasing a design for it to be out-of-date immediately.
I do think that the MP is not seen as a top priority within Apple, which is unfortunate, and, I think, shortsighted. But I also don't have access to sales figures, margins, any clue of what Apple plans to do in the future, etc.
I agree that now is not a good time to upgrade the Mac Pro. It hasn't changed since July 2009 though, and an interim upgrade would have made sense.
The point is that incremental upgrades bring new features to the users faster than waiting a long time for a "big bang" upgrade.
Too bad that Apple hides their unit sales numbers, because I would bet that more Mac Pro systems are sold than most models of motherboards. The design tools and manufacturing are mostly automated.
The point is that incremental upgrades bring new features to the users faster than waiting a long time for a "big bang" upgrade.
Too bad that Apple hides their unit sales numbers, because I would bet that more Mac Pro systems are sold than most models of motherboards. The design tools and manufacturing are mostly automated.
I agree that now is not a good time to upgrade the Mac Pro. It hasn't changed since July 2009 though, and an interim upgrade would have made sense.
Prepare for the worst, and you won't be disappointed.![]()
There's been a lot of comments in this thread accusing Mac Pro owners of whinging too much about more frequent and/or better updates because the Mac Pro is built for longevity and is very upgradable.
I own a 2006 Mac Pro, and I love it. It still does run quite well for it's age BUT, sometimes it does chug along and I think about upgrading it. But what really are my options?
The only processors which will work in my motherboard are 3.0ghz Clovertowns which are still expensive and hard to come by.
I have a ATI 4870 graphics card, which I would love to upgrade too, but according to Barefeats, there's not much to upgrade to as the CPU starts to become a bottleneck. Has anyone been able to test various graphics cards and come up with the one that is better than the 4870/5770 and yet doesn't get bottlenecked?
I would really just like to gut the whole thing and buy a new motherboard, ram etc, but as far as I know, you cannot replace the motherboard as it's a custom design.
I guess i'll buy a boot drive SSD soon, but apart from that, i'm stumped for upgrades. Suggestions welcome.