You guys are all my new heroes. this would have degenerated into name calling on any other forum I have ever been on.
Hyperthreading is a nifty buzzword that Intel throws around to make consumers feel like they know something.
It IS OS dependent, it is also App dependent.
I have a Toshiba Staellite P10 (Intel 2.66 with HT technology!!) it doesn't rip through video files any faster than my Athlon 2.4 without HT technology.
It doesn't appear to download Email any faster. It doesn't boot up any faster, in fact, my Athlon 64 bit systems kick the crap out of it, soundly, in every category.
Threads are the basic logic chains that a program uses to execute. Single threaded programs can only run in one logic path, anything that holds up that path, holds up everything. Multi-threaded apps, process data in multiple paths simultaneously. The benefits are obvious. You have a pause, or a timer, or a logic intensive loop in one "thread" it has only minimal, if any impact on the other threads.
Hyperthreading is multithreading squared....or slightly less...who knows? I seriously doubt that it's equal to dual, dual CPU's, but I'm sure that there's something to it that compelled Intel to spend lots of marketing money on the word.
P4's with HT are fast, you have to give them that. So is Athlons 64 bit CPU.
So is my new G5 powermac with dual 1.8's...?
It's all relative to......uh...reality?
Don't sweat it. there are far too many variables in the big equasion for us to be able to comprehend them all.
How fast can you browse the internet? Download noodie pictures? listen to music? edit a photo?
It's the enjoyment you get from using your computer that counts.
What's next? I don't know, but I'll sure as hell buy one and play with it!!
Peace!!!
Paul.