I'm pretty sure I know what the result would be, but I am curious if anyone has attempted to swap the retina display with the standard on an older MBP.
Since the display is actually part of the screen housing now, you'd have to replace the entire top panel with the one from the rMBP, and since the rMBP is slightly smaller in all dimensions, I doubt it would fit.
Yeah I don't even think the logic boards are the same and if the pin connectors are the same. Further more the chassis is totally different. Did you even read any of the articles about the RMBP. They totally redesigned the screen construction. They removed the glass panel and stuff, made it thinner and what not.
But seriously whats the point. Downgrading from retina to hi-res? You want to save power or something?
Is this a joke?
That's my impression as well. Either it's impossible to get the screen transferred to another screen enclosure, or the entire new screen simply won't fit into the slotting of the old macbook. The best that could be done is an adapter, which will only give you bragging rights that you did it, though now you have essentially a two piece laptop.
Bragging rights? It would look hideous since it wouldn't fit together properly
The connectors are probably different too so you'd have to fabricate an adapter yourself- I doubt anybody will be making them.
Why don't you just buy the old MBP if you don't want the Retina display? The specs on the mid-2012 legacy Pro is identical. Sure, it's a bit thicker and heavier, but it's certainly better than having two different laptops held on with duct tape or something like that. Pull out the ODD to save a bit of weight![]()
That's my impression as well. Either it's impossible to get the screen transferred to another screen enclosure, or the entire new screen simply won't fit into the slotting of the old macbook.
It would be the other way around, why spend 3k+ on a macbook if you can get a new display. Did that with another notebook in the past due to screen/keyboard scratching. Warranty didn't cover it and the screen only cost $150, much cheaper than their cost to fix.
It would be the other way around, why spend 3k+ on a macbook if you can get a new display. Did that with another notebook in the past due to screen/keyboard scratching. Warranty didn't cover it and the screen only cost $150, much cheaper than their cost to fix.
I'm confused. You want to upgrade your regular MBP with a retina display, but where are you getting the retina display? Are you going to order a $3k laptop, take the screen out....and then what? You're left with a screen-less $3k laptop you can't return.
I tried this. I didn't work. I took two machines apart and got all the parts mixed up. Now I have a lot of parts that don't fit together. I also stepped one something and it cracked. Not my best work by far.![]()
That's my impression as well. Either it's impossible to get the screen transferred to another screen enclosure, or the entire new screen simply won't fit into the slotting of the old macbook. The best that could be done is an adapter, which will only give you bragging rights that you did it, though now you have essentially a two piece laptop.
----------
No, upgrading to retina. And in reality, bragging rights. I can't see the connection from all the reviews of the old and new macbook to see if they're the same or not. I know the screen has been redesigned.
----------
Is a macbook teardown a joke?