This seems to be mostly shine and no substance - intentionally timed to pre-empt Apple and Globalstar's announcement next month. Informative thread here -->
Last edited:
What could go wrong. All those T-Mobile data breeches and Security researcher Lennert Wouters said it cost him only $25 to build a device that could hack into Starlink's satellite internet service."The important thing about this is that it means there are no dead zones anywhere in the world for your cell phone," said SpaceX CEO Elon Musk, in a press release announcing the plan. "We're incredibly excited to do this with T-Mobile."
It's not even next week, it's the week after. We'll see if it's still in the news then.This seems to be mostly shine and no substance - intentionally timed to pre-empt Apple and Globalstar's announcement next week -->
T-Mobile is absolute garbage in my area.
If this actually works, does that mean that T-Mobile might be work trying out?
"Exact speeds would depend on how many T-Mobile customers are simultaneously using the service in a given cell zone."Hopefully it works , when cruising![]()
That was exactly my thought. They did not mention how big they expect the cell sizes to be. Seems even a few square miles of sparse people could overload it. Cell phone radios are also chatty and I don't really understand how they plan to ignore them."Exact speeds would depend on how many T-Mobile customers are simultaneously using the service in a given cell zone."
So, a few hundred people on a ship using T-Mobile would likely render it useless.
If Elon Musk is involved then I won’t get my hopes up for whatever this service is.
What could go wrong. All those T-Mobile data breeches and Security researcher Lennert Wouters said it cost him only $25 to build a device that could hack into Starlink's satellite internet service.
![]()
The Hacking of Starlink Terminals Has Begun
It cost a researcher only $25 worth of parts to create a tool that allows custom code to run on the satellite dishes.www.wired.com
And the headline is a little confusing. No satellite system “requires” an iPhone to actually operate.Sort of misleading/promoting an iPhone 14 article.
Why are you reaching out? The presser clearly states ALL mid range 5G phones. It's simply using cell technology to connect to the phone, not satellite. It's Sat to the provider. It's also over a year out from Beta. What does Apple have to do with it?We've reached out to T-Mobile and Apple for clarification, but the companies did not immediately respond to our requests for comment.
Yeh, I think the writer has misread the press releases.And the headline is a little confusing. No satellite system “requires” an iPhone to actually operate.
Probably 2 years. It's happened now, because they are both public companies & it's a big project. This isn't like a hush hush early Apple secret product.It would be interesting to know how long this will take to implement, and why the announcement happened now.
Hmm - I can’t believe all that Musk has done so far. He keeps pushing the envelope forward. Not everything always gets done, but he sure is full of ideas. He has definitely revolutionized EV cars, which is an amazing accomplishment. Keep it up Elon!If Elon Musk is involved then I won’t get my hopes up for whatever this service is.
Thats correct. It's already been said. Global deals later with SpaceX.Since it use cellular spectrum it will only be available where T Mobile is licensed, this means the US and a few other areas.
I would put Verizon above AT&T, no doubt. But curious on your perspective, you'd still put T-Mobile at the top even with more data breaches in the last few years than you can count on one hand?Having been with all three, I rank them as:
T-Mobile > Verizon > AT&T
As such, this is more to ’love’ as far as carriers are concerned