1) there's zero chance that all the content providers in BingOn are not paying the operator a fee to have the privilege of having unlimited access to their customers. Providers have to be paying T-Mobile somehow.
2) if it issue under discussion was the waste of higher resolution video on mobile devices T-Mobile could reward *any* content provider that enforces certain lowered quality video when streaming to mobile devices of their network by not counting this traffic into their users. Not gonna happen.
3) it is obvious that having a flat rate of anything makes you consume more. Even at lowered quality, the amount of video traffic consumed will multiply. As we know, mobile network bandwidth is limited (much more than fixed) and it cannot be increased easily nor quickly. This will mean that other traffic will suffer. It's yet to be seen if this other traffic is throttled down or everything will start to stutter.
Google Play Music was already on the list for TMo's Music Freedom. It's not THAT big of a surprise unless you're not good at putting obvious facts together.
No need to be so rude about it or attempt to goad me into something that the mods need to intervene.
I was NOT Aware Google Play Music on Music Freedom. The issue at hand here though is video NOT Music and fairly certain that Google ( not unlike other companies that have multiple areas they deal with ) keeps parts of their business segmented ergo Google Play/Google Play music may not necessarily have ANY Bearing on YouTube
Google issue was that t-mobile was compressing video regardless of whether it was a partners video and we're not very clear about it. They were absolutely right to question this and t-mobile, as a result, changed their user agreement.
As far as why they weren't on the list from the beginning, I've tried my best to explain that above. There were a few articles that covered this when the service was first announced, so I'm lead to believe they're factual. Difficult to find them now (Else is link) since there have been many subsequent press releases and news stories regarding binge on.
[doublepost=1458378720][/doublepost]
I provided the best source I could find (T-mobile own press release) above, though I read a few articles early on that claimed the same.
As far as t-mobile charging in the future, I agree that would be a concern, but I feel like that's something to take issue with if that does happen. I personally feel like there isn't much sense in going down the "what if route", because there really isn't a reason to think this is going to happen
among other things this is a way to lessen the load on towers. Simply having binge on turned on lessens the load in all forms of video and providers that opt in are able.ro give tmobike the information necessary to further optimize said video.
.
I'm aware of what Google's issues were and I agree with Google and you. Just slightly surprised they did a 180