Meanwhile in Europe:
I just switched from T-Mobile to Sprint when Sprint announced their new 50% off your bill promo. 2 lines for $40 total can't be beat. Also, we get better coverage from Sprint! No regrets at all. I encourage everyone to go to Sprint!
That's a really good point but they did a little bite. I took a whole bite and switch to T-Mobile it's a love and hate relationship in a different way. 95% of the time because of their coverage has improved at my work that's where the benefits for me. But when I travel that's where I start beating myself. I don't even think AT&T and Verizon are worried like we perceived how T-Mobile as a game changer. But onced their network is improved that's the time we can say T-Mobile is a game changer.T mobile and sprint are really are really trying to stir it up. Unfortunately att and Verizon won't bite
AT&T and Verizon are definitely worried. Since Legere took the helm of T-Mobile the entire industry has changed drastically, and it has mostly been following in T-Mobile's lead with things like phone installments and more-permenant contract buy-out programs. Even little things, like data-rollover and expanded international roaming.That's a really good point but they did a little bite. I took a whole bite and switch to T-Mobile it's a love and hate relationship in a different way. 95% of the time because of their coverage has improved at my work that's where the benefits for me. But when I travel that's where I start beating myself. I don't even think AT&T and Verizon are worried like we perceived how T-Mobile as a game changer. But onced their network is improved that's the time we can say T-Mobile is a game changer.
I just switched from Sprint to T-Mobile two months ago after 16 years with Sprint.I just switched from T-Mobile to Sprint when Sprint announced their new 50% off your bill promo. 2 lines for $40 total can't be beat. Also, we get better coverage from Sprint! No regrets at all. I encourage everyone to go to Sprint!
I left Sprint about six years ago, and ended up on T-Mobile after a month or so on Verizon.I just switched from Sprint to T-Mobile two months ago after 16 years with Sprint.
My coverage is excellent everywhere and unlike Sprint I can now make phone calls at home without call failure or people dropping in and out.
I encourage everyone to do what makes sense for them. Sprint no longer makes any sense for us.
Have to? No. They do not.Well if you pay your ETF Sprint should have to unlock your phone. I know in the past Sprint wouldn't unlock iPhones, but I believe they have to now. And the newer Sprint iPhones do support T-mobile bands. And T-mobile is paying the ETF in addition to the $200 according to the article.
I hanged with Sprint from 2011 to two months ago because call quality was still fine. Didn't like it, but things were improving.I left Sprint about six years ago, and ended up on T-Mobile after a month or so on Verizon.
At the time, T-Mobile coverage really was poor, but my search for a cellular carrier led me to get a job at T-Mo, and even the SERO plan doesn't compete with an employee phone rate (no longer work there, for the record.)
Over the past six years, T-Mo's network has done amazing things that a lot of people don't realize. They had Magenta way back when the Sidekick was a thing, and are comparing their current coverage to THAT, rather than looking at what Neville and team have accomplished.
Why would they, they have much larger networks so most people will still value the coverage more. I couldn't switch to T-Mobile even if I wanted to because they have no or poor service in a lot of places I need it.T mobile and sprint are really are really trying to stir it up. Unfortunately att and Verizon won't bite
LOL.And I've yet to see this new "LTE Plus".
Is this on top of any other "uncarrier" promotions where they buy off any remaining debt on your line as well?
Well I can't speak about AT&T but I can understand why Verizon won't bite. They unequivocally have the best and largest coverage of all the the above carriers and they don't need to bow down to Sprint and T-mo's level. That's not to say Verizon couldn't lower their prices and expand beyond being the "Business Customer's" carrier of choice, but still....
Have to? No. They do not.
Will they? Yes. As of February 15, 2015 (earlier this year). And they do it automatically for the 5c and above.
Why do I split hairs on your statement? Because Sprint, with the other three carriers entered an agreement together to do this. It is not a legal agreement and it is not binding. The four carriers simply decided to agree to some common terms and unlock phones.
The reason they did that is because all of them were being threatened by the potential of Congress to pass laws that would force them to do this. They choose to do it under their terms in order to avoid that.
Now there is a currently on the books law requiring unlocking when you've paid off your device. But that does not really apply here because the loopholes in that law are big enough to drive a semi-truck through.
So. They can and they will. But they do not have to.
Don't get me wrong. I was not disputing your point of getting the phone unlocked. Yes that is indeed valid.I'm fine with your hair splitting, but when I give my word to do something I consider it something that I "have to" do. And likewise when a company gives their word by signing onto an agreement, I also consider it something that they "have to" do. But you are right that they did come to an industry wide agreement rather than subject themselves to potential government regulation.
And my original point that someone with a newer iPhone on Sprint can get it unlocked by paying the ETF (reimbursed by T-mobile) and then use it with full support for T-mobile frequencies is valid.
That's YOUR experience, so don't say my post is bunk. I have had T-mo, Sprint and Verizon and without a doubt Verizon has worked in plenty more areas that T-mo gave up on. And of course that's MY experience but don't say somebody's post is bunk just because you have a different experience...That's bunk. I've been a Verizon customer for years. Their network is good, but in major metropolitan cities it's no better than TMO. And in my major metropolitan city they have plenty, and I mean plenty of dead zones. They charge like they're invincible. But they're not. If it weren't for coverage in the mountains I would have dropped their arrogant asses long ago. TMO keeps going like they are and they will catch up in a couple of years. Then Verizon will either have to lower their prices or I am dropping them like a hot potato.
The 2nd gift for Sprint switchers should be a free phone that works on TM since Sprint phones do not. 200 bucks and no phone? Give up that new Sprint iPhone for $200?