Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I haven't found one claim by T-Mobile or anywhere else stating the percentage of population they cover. Verizon and AT&T are always claiming the have the most coverage, I don't see T-Mobile making that claim. Verizon is claiming a huge chunk of the population is covered by LTE. What percentage does T-Mobile cover with 3G?

I have no idea... I've never heard a number. But 100% of their network is 4G, and will be LTE by the end of 2013. They may actuall give Verizon a run for their money on LTE coverage by the end of the year.
 
Apple Product Resale Value

First I buy a top of the line 64GB iPad 3 w/LTE model, spending over $1000 with a case, smart cover and AppleCare+ and 6 months later they introduce a better model. Next I buy a new, AT&T subsidized 32GB iPhone 5 and then, today, Apple reveals an updated, better model exactly 32 days after I purchased mine. I can't help but feel just a little bit agitated because I have been burned by Apple on product resale value, not once, but twice now - and both rather recently. I suppose Apple devices are becoming truly disposable since they obviously don't retain their value like they once did. I'll certainly think twice before shelling out a boatload of quid for another Apple product any time soon!

Burn me once, shame on you. Burn me twice, shame on me.
 
It's great for family plan.


here's the cost for a FAMILY PLAN with these usages

line 1: unlimited talk, unlimited text, unlimited data
line 2: unlimited talk, unlimited text, 2.5 GB of data
line 3: unlimited talk, unlimited text, 500MB of data
line 4: unlimited talk, unlimited text, 500MB of data

$80 (first 2 lines) + $10 (3rd line) + $10 (4th line) + $20 (unlimited data for line 1) + $10 (2GB extra for line 2) = $130

$130 / 4 = $32.5


==================================================

cost of a FAMILY PLAN with low data usage / use wifi instead

Line 1: unlimited talk, unlimited text and 500MB of data
Line 2: unlimited talk, unlimited text and 500MB of data.
Line 3: unlimited talk, unlimited text and 500MB of data
Line 4: unlimited talk, unlimited text and 500MB of data

$80 (line 1 and line 2) + $10 (for line 3) + $10 (for line 4)= $100

$100 / 4 = $25 per line
 
Depends on where you live. Most places I've been T-Mobile's coverage has been excellent. In my home town they actually have better coverage than even Verizon. The only exception I would have to give is travelling to remote areas of the southeast, where T-Mobile often doesn't have any coverage at all outside of the biggest cities.

As I was driving across the west/southwest a few months ago I was monitoring coverage and speeds on T-Mobile, AT&T, and Verizon as I drove. AT&T's coverage was by far the worst of the three... quite spotty with ton of dropped calls. Verizon had coverage for nearly my entire drive -- only lost signal a couple of times, but LTE was only available in limited areas, and their 3G isn't very fast.

In most cities of any size, actual throughput on T-Mobile's "4G" was at least as good as, and in the majority of cases faster, than AT&T's LTE -- T-Mobile consistently got 8-13Mbps everywhere I tested, but AT&T, even in LTE areas, was all over the map. I never saw a speed on AT&T LTE over 13 Mbps, and most of the time it was more in the 6-10 Mbps range for LTE and 2-3 Mbps for 3G. Verizon was by far the most consistent in terms of coverage. And their speed was consistent for a given cellular technology -- 10-18 Mbps on LTE, 1.5-2 Mbps on 3G.

I know that AT&T LTE can be fast. There is an AT&T tower across the parking lot from my office, and I consistently get 13-15 Mbps when I'm at work. But they tend to space their towers farther apart than other carriers, so coverage quality varies a lot more with their network than the others..

Yeah, well I travel a lot. And during most of my travels, my friends T-mobile phone has no service. It's good in cities... but when in rural areas it's pretty bad. Not as bad as Sprint... but pretty bad nonetheless.
 
This is actually terrific. I'm making a big, big move and am needing to save as much money as possible. I've been meaning to switch to Verizon for quite a while, but this, again, is wonderful.

Thank you, T-Mobile!
 
First I buy a top of the line 64GB iPad 3 w/LTE model, spending over $1000 with a case, smart cover and AppleCare+ and 6 months later they introduce a better model. Next I buy a new, AT&T subsidized 32GB iPhone 5 and then, today, Apple reveals an updated, better model exactly 32 days after I purchased mine. I can't help but feel just a little bit agitated because I have been burned by Apple on product resale value, not once, but twice now - and both rather recently. I suppose Apple devices are becoming truly disposable since they obviously don't retain their value like they once did. I'll certainly think twice before shelling out a boatload of quid for another Apple product any time soon!

Burn me once, shame on you. Burn me twice, shame on me.

If you care too much for the resale value, then I got bad news for you...technology moves, fast. Heck, the resale drops the instant you unwrap the box. It's like driving a new car off the lot. Also, you're an AT&T customer, why are you feeling bad about this T-Mobile iPhone announcement? The tweaked model is only beneficial to the latter's customers.
 
Last edited:
First I buy a top of the line 64GB iPad 3 w/LTE model, spending over $1000 with a case, smart cover and AppleCare+ and 6 months later they introduce a better model. Next I buy a new, AT&T subsidized 32GB iPhone 5 and then, today, Apple reveals an updated, better model exactly 32 days after I purchased mine. I can't help but feel just a little bit agitated because I have been burned by Apple on product resale value, not once, but twice now - and both rather recently. I suppose Apple devices are becoming truly disposable since they obviously don't retain their value like they once did. I'll certainly think twice before shelling out a boatload of quid for another Apple product any time soon!

Burn me once, shame on you. Burn me twice, shame on me.

Would you rather Apple did not put out a new phone such that T-Mobile could get the iPhone ?
 
Does this mean that T-Mobile's special "Web" plan, that was $30/month with 100 minutes of talk-time and unlimited texts and data is completely gone?

That was a good deal for people that don't talk a lot on the phone.

As far as I can tell that plan is still available as a prepaid plan. The new plans introduced today are all post pay. Not sure if TMO will let prepaid users get the iPhone at the price announced today or if we will have to buy a phone from Apple at full retail.

I'm currently on that plan with my unlocked iP4...rarely speak on the phone...really looking forward to the faster speeds the iP5 will offer!

----------

I haven't found one claim by T-Mobile or anywhere else stating the percentage of population they cover. Verizon and AT&T are always claiming the have the most coverage, I don't see T-Mobile making that claim. Verizon is claiming a huge chunk of the population is covered by LTE. What percentage does T-Mobile cover with 3G?

TMO is always touting "The nation's largest 4G network." But they count their HSPA+ network as 4G....and it is quite fast and good. The fact that the iPhone will now work on both refarmed and non-refarmed HSPA+ spectrum is great....even where there isn't LTE, the phone will fall back on their great HSPA+ network which you could argue is only 3G, but pretty dang good 3G.
 
As far as I can tell that plan is still available as a prepaid plan. The new plans introduced today are all post pay. Not sure if TMO will let prepaid users get the iPhone at the price announced today or if we will have to buy a phone from Apple at full retail.

I'm currently on that plan with my unlocked iP4...rarely speak on the phone...really looking forward to the faster speeds the iP5 will offer!


Great! I was waiting to see if yesterday's press conference had any better deals, but then got nervous when I could't find the prepaid plans anymore!

It doesn't matter to me whether you have to buy the phone outright, although the newer tech iPhone 5 looks to be much better than the older tech.
 
Can someone explain to me how T-Mobile will still make a profit out of all this?

The answer is they will make a decent profit where as the others make a killing. They are banking on you staying with them and making a profit from monthly charges but decoupling the cost of the handset from the deal. This way if you decide to leave they don't make profit but they don't make a loss either. You never know this could be the shake up the US carrier market needs.
 
I was wondering the same. I would prefer at LEAST a 32GB, but want to keep my 64GB. I would switch in a heart beat if they offer 32 or 64GB versions.

I hate VZZ and ATT.

It will be interesting to see because if T-Mobile essentially offers the unlocked only version that means the iPhone 5 will be:

16GB - $650
32GB - $750
64GB - $850

and if they offer a 128GB version for $950?

I am not sure they will sell a whole lot of those, as the monthly payback cost would rise way over $20 per month for 24 Months

----------

Just take a look at their coverage maps. And I can tell you from experience while travelling that T-Mobile 3G (4G) is much more prevalent than LTE on either Verizon or AT&T.

Verizon (scroll down to see the map):
http://www.verizonwireless.com/b2c/...sttype=NEWREQUEST&coveragetype=datacoverage4g

AT&T:
(They don't seem to have an LTE coverage map on their site... at least I couldn't find one... but their LTE coverage is far smaller than Verizon's)

T-Mobile:
http://www.t-mobile.com/coverage/pcc.aspx/

http://www.att.com/network/

Just select the 4G LTE Coverage in the middle of the page it will give you their map...
 
I have no idea... I've never heard a number. But 100% of their network is 4G, and will be LTE by the end of 2013. They may actuall give Verizon a run for their money on LTE coverage by the end of the year.

Not according to what I've read. They have 0 LTE now. No way they will match Verizon in the next 8 months, IMO, of course based on what I have read. Verizon has been working on their LTE for about 2 years if memory serves me correctly. There is a reason T-Mobile doesn't make claims about their network size.
 
How is it any different?

First, you're not obligated to buy the phone, you have the option to return it when canceling service and owing nothing more. Second, with the service contracts, you are stuck with an early termination fee even if you don't bring your own phone. TM, you can just walk away any time and owe nothing. Is that an option with ATT, Verizon, or sprint?

Could you explain how is it actually cheaper paying the $20/month over buying the iPhone upfront?

$99 plus 24 payments of $20 is $579. Apple charges $649.
 
For those saying that T-Mobile's 4G network isn't competitive, here's just one example of how they are...

I tested the speed on Verizon, AT&T (both LTE) and T-Mobile's 4G in my front yard. The towers for all three carriers are on the nearby mountain, line of sight, about 3/4 mile away, situated very close to one another. The Verizon device showed 4 bars of signal strength, as did the T-Mobile device, where the AT&T showed 2. (Odd considering the towers are so close to one another.)

Verizon LTE:
[url=http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8102/8593560615_fbe67dbdcd.jpg]Image[/url]
Verizon LTE by doubledeej, on Flickr

AT&T LTE:
[url=http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8108/8594660578_5db763fbfd.jpg]Image[/url]
AT&T LTE by doubledeej, on Flickr

T-Mobile 4G:
[url=http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8099/8594660564_ee990377f0.jpg]Image[/url]
T-Mobile 4G by doubledeej, on Flickr

A couple of those tests show that the devices were on WiFi, but that actually wasn't the case. WiFi was turned on, but wasn't connected. I made sure to run the last few tests with WiFi turned off so the icon is correct.

I know speed varies by area, but for anyone to make a blanket statement that AT&T's LTE or Verizon's LTE is always faster than T-Mobile's 4G is just not correct. Where I live (whole city, not just my home) T-Mo has the best coverage, and the near the fastest real-world speeds.

Thank you for providing this information. I plan to go to the T-Mobile store on April 12th and try out the iPhone to see what type of speed using speedtest.net I would get in Grand Rapids, Michigan.
 
Last edited:
First, you're not obligated to buy the phone, you have the option to return it when canceling service and owing nothing more. Second, with the service contracts, you are stuck with an early termination fee even if you don't bring your own phone. TM, you can just walk away any time and owe nothing. Is that an option with ATT, Verizon, or sprint?



$99 plus 24 payments of $20 is $579. Apple charges $649.

Okay, I see what you mean. I do like the idea of turning the phone in if you no longer want to remain with T-Mobile. I didn't know you could turn the phone in, I thought T-Mobile only said that the customer could do a trade-in anytime. In a slight way, it's sort of a rental if you turn the phone in not fully paid. I can live with that. Okay, well then T-Mobile does appear to be offering a great deal. That'll work!:)
 
Because you can sell the phone back to the carrier for fair market value... or pay it off, unlock it, keep it, and be done. Or if you pay for the phone up front, you just walk away without any ETF. None of the other carriers give you that option.

This is the part that has been thinking very seriously about switching to T-Mobile. I was with T-Mobile about 8 years ago. I remember the T-Mobile customer service being great at that time. Unfortunately, their service area was not great where I lived at that time. Looking at their map coverage now it is vastly improved. I am looking forward to coming back to T-Mobile come April 12th.
 
Mobile is creeping up to home internet speeds! (well there's still 40mbps to go, but it's a leap over 3G)

Sitting on my back porch, 4G is MUCH faster than WIFI.

----------

Well that sucks. I can't take my factory unlocked Verizon iPhone 5 to T-Mobile and use their AWS 3G/4G spectrum. They are re-farming their spectrum to the compatible band here in Houston, but that doesn't help me nationwide until they re-farm every market.

Isn't is true generally that Verizon phones don't work on other carrier's networks? Indeed, I thought that VZ phones worked ONLY on VZ networks.

Are there significant exceptions to this general statement?
 
Sitting on my back porch, 4G is MUCH faster than WIFI.

Faster than Wifi in general on the iPhone? I'm sure the wifi chip has a larger bandwidth than 3G (don't know the exact numbers, just that N-band is huge).
 
I have no idea... I've never heard a number. But 100% of their network is 4G, and will be LTE by the end of 2013. They may actuall give Verizon a run for their money on LTE coverage by the end of the year.

Not even close. Go look at a coverage map and zoom in. More specifically NH, Maine, Massachusetts, etc. Pretty much all EDGE.

If it took VZW almost 2 years to cover their network with LTE, how can a useless company like TMo do it faster?

----------


That isn't true. T-Mobile finished upgrading their entire network to "4G" more than a year ago. AT&T's LTE coverage is still sparse. Verizon has a lot of LTE, but it doesn't cover anywhere near as much area as T-Mobile's 3G.

I think you'll drank the magenta koolaid. VZW has more LTE in the US than TMobile has 3G, this is an undisputed fact. Go look at a map (or hell, provide us a source). Go look at sensorly. TMo isn't even close.

Look at all the blue on the TMo map. It's basically EDGE, whereas VZW is LTE.

2p4gm


2p4h5


AT&T's footprint for EDGE/HSPA+

2p4rU


significantly more expansive than T-Mobile


I can drive from Boston to DC and never loose LTE on AT&T/VZW. T-Mobile? most major highways are all EDGE.
 
Not even close. Go look at a coverage map and zoom in. More specifically NH, Maine, Massachusetts, etc. Pretty much all EDGE.

If it took VZW almost 2 years to cover their network with LTE, how can a useless company like TMo do it faster?

----------




I think you'll drank the magenta koolaid. VZW has more LTE in the US than TMobile has 3G, this is an undisputed fact. Go look at a map (or hell, provide us a source). Go look at sensorly. TMo isn't even close.

...

I can drive from Boston to DC and never loose LTE on AT&T/VZW. T-Mobile? most major highways are all EDGE.

I don't think Sensorly is a reliable source of data. For example, they have absolutely no data about the city where I live, which is a metropolitan area of over 1.5 million people which has had Verizon LTE for 18 months, AT&T LTE for 6 months, and T-Mo 4G for several years. Sensorly's dataset is way too small to be representative of what coverage is actually like. The "Coverage?" app on iOS shows a lot more data, but it too is skewed because there haven't been any iOS devices on T-Mobile to capture data.

I can't speak for the East, but in the West where I live and drive (many states across the west), T-Mobile's 4G covers quite a bit more area than LTE for VZ or AT&T... but most especially AT&T.
 
It will be interesting to see because if T-Mobile essentially offers the unlocked only version that means the iPhone 5 will be:

16GB - $650
32GB - $750
64GB - $850

If we go buy what T-Mobile is charging for the 16GB iPhone 5 with its $99 down $20/month for 24 months:

16GB - $579
32GB - $679
64GB - $779

I am hoping that T-Mobile offers the 32GB for $79 down and $25/month for 24 months. But I suspect that it would be something more like $199 down and $20/month for 24 months.
 
Can someone explain to me how T-Mobile will still make a profit out of all this?

By cutting out sales reps' comm. at stores. Such price could only be available online. Their sales reps will flock to VZW or other carriers's stores to work because there will be no meat left since every plan is "un-contract".
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.