am not getting less noticeable time on my battery; it's certainly better than the very-first OS26 betas. just my experience here, of course...Eh… losing an hour of battery life on the M1 or M2 Air is meaningful if you tend to push those machines under Sequoia. The M3 result is weird and I'm not well read enough on the differences between the M1/M2 vs M3 to even guess as to why.
Doesn't matter to me, I use my laptop on battery only occasionally, but just because it doesn’t seem like a big deal to me doesn’t mean others won’t feel the difference.
nice try. if we're not all experiencing the same issues, then, no... you can't speak for 'all users'. that's just being logical.From looking at the jerky pop up window animations it is obviously not optimized and the UI eats more GPU to render the refraction effects. Anything who says there is no issue (usual suspects) is gaslighting you into being silent. You should always complain. It’s the complainers who always give us better computing.
When we talk about performance, battery and benchmarks we have to speak for all users and not selfishly posting “I don’t have any issues”. People who do that are short sighted and have low standards.
It is usually a common thing to have increased system load/power usage in first days after big upgrades no matter what device or platform is in use. Therefore not all of these "tests" can be taken seriously.Those bars don't scream "kills your battery". Certainly not ideal, but no need for melodrama.
These threads would explode into hundreds of posts in few days if this would really be an actual issue. Yet this one is #13...
Something off here.
What test(s) were run that made the M1-M4 last ONLY about 6 hours, anyway?
Strikes me, prima facie, as some sort of strenuous, processor-intensive task(s) that likely bear little relationship to how people use their devices in normal, mixed daily operations.
Certainly must not be similar to anything I use my MacBook Air for — which routinely gives me double to triple the reported battery life.
For sure, the lose of about an hour is a chunk of time, but that could well have a minor impact on overall if the intensive task(s) make up only part of one's day. For example, if one only does it (them) for a hour, the loss is only 10 minutes!
Given the bizarre times, benchmark differences, and behaviors of those laptops, with M1 & M4 lasting about an hour (or two) longer than the M2 and M3 regardless of OS — and the strange inversion of performance for the M3 MBA, makes the entire testing suspect. What else is running or going on with those laptops?
Does the tester explain that? Certainly not watching a random YouTuber to find out, but maybe someone else who did can fill us in!
Do they even have well-established, good bonafides?
In any event, one test by one person does not a case make!
Reading through the comments, I think this is due to running the tests at max brightness. The mba m1 only goes up to 400 nits unlike the newer macbook air models which could explain that.since when does the mba m1 have more battery than newer models ??
Same here: M2 Max MBP 16", iPhone 16 Pro, iPad pro 11". The OS26 update eats the battery faster and has a lot of other glitches that interrupt workflow.