Yes you're right people don't give a **** these days about music quality and this is part of the problem, most of them listening to music from cheap computer loudspeakers and EarPods.
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Taylor Swift Criticizes Apple Music's Free Trial in Open Letter
- Thread starter MacRumors
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
Yes you're right people don't give a **** these days about music quality and this is part of the problem, most of them listening to music from cheap computer loudspeakers and EarPods.
The response from this community, knowing that many of you are creatives yourselves, has surprised me. I can't believe many of you actually support Apple in this move. It is categorically wrong.
Irrespective of whether the artist is an indie artist (many of which earn nearer the average National wage than you'd like to imagine) or an already superstar worth millions - they deserve to paid in full for their work. Apple are choosing to offer the free trial, not the artists, so Apple should foot the cost, not the artists.
And for those who stupidly think artists should "just sign-up in September then" ...The free trial isn't simply June to September, it's 3 months from whenever your start, be that June this year, or October next year. The majority of income from an album sales/streams is made in the first few months after release - so a three month un-paid trial has the potential to turn a big earning album into a financial flop.
Irrespective of whether the artist is an indie artist (many of which earn nearer the average National wage than you'd like to imagine) or an already superstar worth millions - they deserve to paid in full for their work. Apple are choosing to offer the free trial, not the artists, so Apple should foot the cost, not the artists.
And for those who stupidly think artists should "just sign-up in September then" ...The free trial isn't simply June to September, it's 3 months from whenever your start, be that June this year, or October next year. The majority of income from an album sales/streams is made in the first few months after release - so a three month un-paid trial has the potential to turn a big earning album into a financial flop.
This whole argument would be much more convincing if you could plug in some figures to the theory.
How much does a typical artist who is "living from paycheck to paycheque" typically earn from other streaming services?
Sorry, but I disagree.
Much of the Music industries issues is that they have constantly looked to drag their feet in regards to demand, distribution and model concerning modern technology.
While I can understand certain musicians may struggle, this notion that technology companies have a hand in it is daft. The same way that bad and semi unemployed actors should somehow receive compensation from cable companies.
Not really artists are always evolving. Just because you do one genre doesn't mean you shouldn't crossover and do other genres. That is what keeps thing creative and interesting and innovative. artists like software companies have to be willing to innovate and go outside of themselves.
Last edited:
Exactly this.
No financial benefit to Apple or the artists during the trial.
No financial benefit to Apple after the trial that doesn't also involve financial benefit to the artists.
What has happened to this place? I guess all the appleinsider white supremacists got banned and are showing up here. The amount of snobbery and misogyny in this thread is what I'd expect from AI, not macrumors.
I have worked for free a lot in my life and I still do from time to time , as an activist, for just causes, for the unfurtunate refugees etc. when a ridiculously rich company as apple ask people to work for free, then they need to get back to earth. Maybe back in the days when apple was on the brink to bankruptcy this could have been just. Now ehh, someone in the marketing dept. might look for another job.....cause this will backfire. Its just plain stupidity to ask people to work for free. Apple is now a candidate for the "mr. Burns" title of 2015.
This isn't about a free streaming music service, imho. This is about Apple telling someone they will not be paid for their product even though Apple is using it to promote theirs.
Not quite 3 months though. Do they still have a restocking fee too or has that been dropped?No but you do get it free for 14 days. You can use it, talk on it, play on it, download apps and show it off. Then simply return it for a full refund. Did you forget about that?
As a musician, I agree with her 100%. I really, really dislike streaming services. Both of my albums make most of their money on iTunes. They made almost nothing via streaming. The payout is criminally low. Therefore, I not only don't - but can't - do streaming anymore. Not worth it.
No. It wasn't when the trial wasn't active.
Again, is Spotify paying artists for the trial period? Has there been any statement or insider information?
Apple's plan to wipe out disc drives is nearly complete
Apple wasn't the first company to exclude a disc drive from its machines, though Apple's move came at a time when many PC competitors were aiming to upgrade the disc drives on notebooks from DVD readers to drives that could read high-definition discs. For Apple, which was making an increasingly large amount of money selling movies and TV shows through iTunes, this never made much sense
http://www.cnet.com/news/apples-plan-to-wipe-out-disc-drives-is-nearly-complete/
They are not that free of guilty...
I don't know anything about music streaming services, but isn't the idea to take away customers from other streaming services? If a lesser known musician was making, say, £10 a day from a rivals service, and that drops off because people move to Apple's with its 3 month trial then that musician will be getting less that isn't being made up for due to said trial.
Phew, I'm glad you told us all your opinion of her.
I can understand where these people are coming from, but I do have to disagree with them.
It's not like you have to pay for a car before you get to test drive it and this is just the same idea. Letting people have a taste of the service before committing to subscribing to it.
It's not like you have to pay for a car before you get to test drive it and this is just the same idea. Letting people have a taste of the service before committing to subscribing to it.
This sentence doesn't even make sense. Check yourself, please.
Do you test drive a car for 3 months? Where can I sign up if so?
I'm on Apple's side on this, but this analogy is terrible.
This is quite a bit different from test driving a car. People know what Apple is and know what streaming is. This isn't some new market we are talking about here. This is an established market and there are low switching costs between Spotify and Apple. Artists giving away songs for free should be their doing not Apple's. You didn't see Apple starting off iTunes with a freemium try it for 3 months free model. No people had to pay immediately.