I understand your point and you are completely correct wrt/ historical missions and the attitude taken by NASA about them.
However we do have the glaring fact that 7 (?) astronauts died as a result of damaged tiles.
The question is: when tile damage occurs, is it the lethal kind or not? Without definitive studies showing what type/location of tile damage leads to hull integrity deterioration, all tile damage situations must be treated as if they will lead to it.
it's sad that many talented people had to die for tile damage to be taken seriously.
While I agree that this is a serious issue, I believe the news media is hyping it up way more than it needs to be. The damage to Columbia was on the leading edge of the wing, an area that experiences huge amounts of thermal pressure on reentry. Additionally, the area of Columbia which was struck is made out of composite materials, and is different than the tile on the bottom of the ship. I have full faith in the engineers working on the shuttle to make a decision that is best for both the ship and the crew - no one at NASA (esp. after Columbia) wants to see ANYTHING bad happen, and they all take their jobs very seriously.
Ah, so you were there for the launch too? How far did you travel for it? I road tripped all the way from Montreal to see it, haha. My job hooked my friends and I up with launch passes and tours of the KSC, so we had a great time. We got to the 600-ft barrier the day before the launch and got some great shots of Endeavour on the pad, even though the shuttle itself was still in its protective housing.
I came from Los Angeles...I was on one of the VIP tours too (I managed to snag an invite from NASA HQ)! There were actually some people on my bus from Montreal...do you happen to remember what bus you were on, or who your tour guide was?