Maybe the advertising "slogan" should change to "Super. Glue."I'm surprised Ive isn't talking about the beautiful quality of gorilla glue and how it's been lovingly dropped into every device.
Haha they aren't "scores," they are capacities, with mAh being the unit of measurement. Whoever wrote this article, please tell me you know that mAh is a capacity and not a benchmark.After inspecting a similar A9X 64-bit processor, iFixit compared the battery capacities of the recent line of iPads to the new iPad Pro. The 9.7-inch iPad Pro's 7,306 mAh is expectedly less than the 12.9-inch iPad Pro's score of 10,307 mAh, but largely in line with the 7,340 mAh of the iPad Air 2. Despite their varying scores, iFixit noted that all three of the iPads have "roughly the same estimated battery life" of about 10 hours.
I do question the repairability index, because almost no tablet, phone or handheld device is really that repairable.
Still, I enjoy seeing these tear downs and I was looking forward to this and the prior SE tear down.
Agreed, but don't you think its odd that Apple didn't promote that feature?It's a pleasant surprise that the camera may have OIS, although on the tech specs it says it has 'Auto Image Stabilisation' the same as the 12.9" Pro iPad.
Agreed, but don't you think its odd that Apple didn't promote that feature?
VERY Odd, then again it's odd they gave it such a camera in the first place. But then again I have gone to events and seen people using iPads to take photos and videos.
I guess their thinking is as it's a powerful device, you can take and edit your 4K content on a nice sized device, easier than doing it on an iPhone screen for instance?
Agreed, but don't you think its odd that Apple didn't promote that feature?
I would take 2 front facing speakers anyday over 4 speakers shooting the sound somewhere else.![]()
In what fantasy do you imagine these devices are "fodder for landfills"? In the actually existing world, they get used until they break (which is a LONG time). They get moved into cars to run the car music system, or get given to family members, or move out the country to act as iPods for people living in poorer countries.Just fodder for landfills. Nothing to see here.
Agreed, with one caveat: Apple doesn't build their hardware purposely to be unfixable, that's assigning intent where none exists; rather, that simply doesn't enter into their considerations. Their hardware is designed to be as compact and reliable as they can make it - these intents are at odds with making it also easily repairable: if they added more repairability, it would negatively impact size and reliability. It's just like the recyclability - a while back there was a big flap with some recyclers saying, "Apple claims the iPhone is recyclable, but we're recyclers and we can't recycle it, so it's actually a throwaway". But building it so it can be easily broken down by any recycler was never a goal for Apple, rather they build something that Apple can recycle. And now they have robots to do just that. "Purposely unfixable" falls in the same category as "Apple purposely makes old phones run slow so people will buy new ones" - assigning malicious intent when simple facts point a different direction (your two year old phone is running _current_ apps slower because they're bigger and more complicated - it would run two year old apps at the same speed it originally did).it's just the disconnect between the site's purpose (finding out how fixable a PC/device is) and the fact that apple builds their hardware to purposely be unfixable. it's like a site called "IndieFlicksOnly" consistently reviewing Marvel blockbusters (and giving them the worst IndieFlick score possible). just a little silly, but taking it too seriously is equally so. enjoy the visuals for what they are: the guts of your iPad that you'll never see otherwise.
i'd say it's not that odd considering the 9.7" is a great viewfinder for video enthusiasts - the only ones who'd be paying attention to it anyway (small demographic compared to many others). when i scrape together enough money, i'll be buying a padcaster http://padcaster.com and start making drafts of videos and content i'd like to see fleshed out later with better equipment. the portability + 'giant' viewfinder is fantastic with iPads, and not many outside the film industry take full advantage.
yes, it's kind of annoying when people at concerts/events use one instead of a smaller phone - but that's not the end-all be-all of iPad's video capabilities. i'm not stating that's what you inferred, just that popular opinion tends to lean towards iPad as a 'video-taking nuisance'
man, they put OIS camera to ipad but not into iphone 6s or SE... tell me sthing about upsell, Mr. Schiller
In what fantasy do you imagine these devices are "fodder for landfills"? In the actually existing world, they get used until they break (which is a LONG time). They get moved into cars to run the car music system, or get given to family members, or move out the country to act as iPods for people living in poorer countries.
Hell, my iPhone 1 still works fine (rocking iOS 3.1.3) acting as a music player for my bathroom/shower.
My sister is using my old iPad 1 as a portable movie player, and my mother uses my old iPad 3 (first retina model) as her computer (good enough for her very limited/simplified email/Facebook type needs).
If your first thought when you buy a new iPhone/iPad is "I'll toss the old one in the trash" maybe that says something more about you than about these devices?