Tech, rather than Apple: Socket 939 Athlons and memory speed

1) Not sure, but really not recommended. The advantage that the Athlon-64 has over previous Athlons (and the Pentium IV) is it's built in memory controller. Crippling that will really slow it down. I'm fairly certain it won't work!

2) No idea: the people I know with these are not using it!

3) With AMDs Cool'N'Quiet enabled they seem to be good.

4) Massive difference! Really worth it!

 

for number 2 windows 64 is still a beta program. It is slower than the 32 bit wiondows there will be a lot of drivers problems due to the fact no one is reallly currently making them.
Get a legit copy of the current 32bit XP for the computer.

The ram would be holding back the computer and since you are not going to use DDR 400 just get a socket 754 amd 64 and even then a it should still be DDR 400

 

Just built a 3500+ as my gaming machine in a shuttle sn95g5 and I cannot hear the processor fan whatsoever..it idles at 33C and gets up into the mid 40's while playing games. In fact the only thing i can hear is my x800xt PE...but just barely.

i think tomshardware just did a benchmark with the socket 939s with ddr33 vs ddr400..

 

Linux

You can fold very nicely on Linux, you know. Why bother with crappy XP? Besides, Linux is free.

 

Sorry it was Anandtech...with halflife 2 benchmarks

http://anandtech.com/cpuchipsets/showdoc.aspx?i=2330&p=3



Also, the newer shuttles are very impressive with heat dissapation and the winchester amd64 processors use ~1/3 the power of the latest pentium 4s

 

I also just built a SN95G5 shuttle with an AMD 3000+. It would be dead quiet had I not gotten the 6800 GT :\

My processor idles around 37C without Cool N Quiet (haven't downloaded it yet). It's very fast for being 1.8GHz. Many have been able to overclock it to around 2.4GHz. I've had it up to 1.98GHz, but I didn't notice any appreciable difference, so I put it back. However, my 3DMark03 CPU score was 616 vs. 577, whatever that means.

And the Athlon 64s accept pc2700 (333) and pc3200 (400) RAM.

I'm moving up from a 1GHz PIII, so I'm blown away by the speed. I really can't help with a comparison between 32 and 64 bit.

 

You should have no problem running it with the 333. The CPU's internal controller will automatically set the speed according the the RAM's rated speed. That is if you have it set to auto in the BIOS which would be the default setting anyway.

I have built seven A64 systems based on the socket 754 and 939 and I have tested and used PC 2100 & PC 2700 without issue. In fact, some setups required me to install some cheap PC 2100 Samsung in order to get it to boot to the BIOS in oder to set the correct VDimm voltage for the high perf Mushkin memory. The only thing you have to be concerned about is if the mobo's chipset is finicky about memory, such as the nVidia chipset. The VIA based not so much but RAM timings are more of an issue at first with the new CPU's onboard memory controller. The question you ask is only partly answerable in the fact that the setup will accept and run at those rated speeds but compatability could be an issue, especially in dual channel mode.

All systems were MSI K8n Neo, Neo2 Platinum and the ASUS I cant remember off hand. All nVidia chipsets. The MSI's were the only ones that did this.

The difference between 333 and 400 is marginal but the only ones who'd notice are folders, benchmark whores, and the avid gamer enthusiast.

You won't suffer that bad until you can afford the PC 3200 and by then, perhaps it won't be worth it. Tough call.

I actually have a media server with the 754 and 2100 memory running flawlessly.