That's not how it works. I was highlighting your deflection, not whether or not you were arguing for Futurix. Those are two different things. Your only contribution to the topic (at that particular point) was "yeah he's biased, but so are other people". No attempt at discussing the topic, either for or against. Just "yeah but them too." That's a whataboutism, plain and simple. Evidence: "...but I was just trying to point out that these forums are a haven for anti-Apple bias". Topic? Nope. Two things: 1. Your comment doesn't say anything like that. There's no way to get "haven for anti-Apple bias" from it. Maybe your inner monologue said that.True- if I were actually trying to argue that "my guy" wasn't biased towards Apple, my reply to you would have been fallacious and meaningless. I don't know "my guy", but I was just trying to point out that these forums are a haven for anti-Apple bias, so it's strange to call out someone who may be biased towards Apple... on an Apple forum.
Now, I completely agree with your second paragraph- nobody knows who is at fault for the Telegram delay, and at least the update has finally gone through.
Now between the two threads, if you can find where I have called out Futurix's bias a bad thing, I'll eat my hat. I can save you some time, I have not done that. In fact I've done the opposite. So there's that. Having a bias towards Apple on an Apple-centric site does not give one carte blanche to make up stuff and not get called on it. That is also not how it works.