Test your systems performance with piX

[IEatApples]

iMac G5 2,1GHz & 1,5GB RAM:

100000 = Calculated in 5.890 seconds

250000 = Calculated in 37.630 seconds

 

[VicRattlehead]

PowerbookG4 1.67GHz w/ 1gb ddr2 sdram
X.4.8

100,000 in 7.790
250,000 in 54.890

 

[axboi87]

iMac G4 700mhz with 256mb Ram, 10.4.8
100k = 19.760
250k = 143.53
I'm sure it won't significantly affect this test but my god this thing needs more ram!

 

[macintoshxiii]

PowerBook G4/ 1.67Ghz/ 1.512Gb ram/ 80Gb HDD

100K = 7.8
250K = 53.0

 

[dobirip]

macbook pro i7 late 2011

2.8 GHz

100,000 - 2.330 , 2.250 , 2.230

250,000 - 14.600 , 14.100 , 14.250

 

[lewis82]

I got 4 seconds for 100 000 on a 2.53GHz C2D with 4GB DR3 1066.

I definitely think that a better way to test performance is to use PowerFractal, which can saturate any number of CPUs, even clusters of 12-core Mac Pros.

Just run the app at 65536 colors and see how many megaflops you get. I got 17565.9 megaflops on the same system, it took 9.8 seconds.

 

[Zwhaler]

I got 4 seconds for 100 000 on a 2.53GHz C2D with 4GB DR3 1066.

I definitely think that a better way to test performance is to use PowerFractal, which can saturate any number of CPUs, even clusters of 12-core Mac Pros.

Cool program!

On 16777216 (highest max count mode) 12 Mac Pro got 280.9 seconds achieving 41484.9 MegaFlops.

On 65536 mode I got 1.1 seconds achieving 150965.4 MegaFlops.

In piX on this machine I got these numbers:

100,000: 2.550 seconds
250,000: 16.580 seconds

I totally forgot about this thread after almost 5 years

 

[Peace]

250,000 in 17.5 secs.

Mac Pro 8-core 2.8Ghz.

With 6 apps running.