OK-- the judges have reviewed the tape and have relayed the call to me to report:
They have ruled that it clearly says:
So let's take a look at the final round leaderboard:
kastenbrust's entry (from the "are you deaf or did someone translate the subtitles for you into chinese?" post:
"ITS THE SAME DISPLAY PROPERTIES FOR THE ANTI-GLARE AS OUR OLD 17" NOTEBOOK"
Used "its" for "it has": -1
Used "old" for "last": -1
Technical violation for using caps, mistakenly giving the impression that Phil Schiller was screaming out his presentation: -0.1
Accuracy total: -2.1
Adokimus's entry (from the "a second, yet different from your first, misquote:" post:
"So it has the SAME DISPLAY PROPERTIES FOR ANTI-GLARE as our last 17" notebook..."
Technical infraction for "So..." capitalized to indicate a new sentence when the judges have ruled it a continuation of the previous sentence (don't mess with the judges!): -0.1
Technical violation for using some caps, mistakenly giving the impression that Phil Schiller was screaming out part of his presentation: -0.1
Accuracy total: -0.2
Thanks to you both for playing and congratulations to Adokimus. See you next year.
Please thank the judges for their ruling! Not to be picky (well, precisely to be picky), but please check my original post:
https://forums.macrumors.com/posts/7109375/
Not only did I provide the sentence preceding "So" (and I would argue that Schiller's speech could be broken into two sentences at that point), but I also wrote "(emphasis added)" below the quote to show that it was my screaming and not Schiller's.
In short, I would like my 0.2 back.
Further, as the user kastenbrust has since been banned, I move that he be disqualified for likely just being a PITA to everyone...