Well, Apple used Open Source to build their OS and should abide by the rules. They are supposed to release the source to Darwin as there is a whole community (OpenDarwin) around making Darwin a good OS all on its own. With Apple cutting the releases out they've screwed the Open Source community, which is who helped Apple get where they are.DerChef said:Apple is a total package i.e you by one copy of an OS per Machine and Apple has always been protective of its products much more so even then microsoft.
Everybody knows this or should do when they go down the Mac road.
I actually think the open source software that has been ported for the Mac has done incredibly little for the wider take up of Apple products.
if GIMP or Neo Office disappeared tomorrow I would shed no tears for them.
BTW, this was partially debunked. And another BTW, when a "developer" whines, the best thing to do is wait a week, because developers who whine are whiney and whiney developers tend to have premature whining problems, if you know what I mean.
DeathChill said:Well, Apple used Open Source to build their OS and should abide by the rules. They are supposed to release the source to Darwin as there is a whole community (OpenDarwin) around making Darwin a good OS all on its own. With Apple cutting the releases out they've screwed the Open Source community, which is who helped Apple get where they are.
I would not have considered OS X if it were not based on unix and, just as importantly, if I couldn't use the open source software that I require professionally (neo office). I'm not alone; about half of the Mac users I know are using OS X for the unix core and OSS support.DerChef said:I actually think the open source software that has been ported for the Mac has done incredibly little for the wider take up of Apple products.
I'd go back to linux.if GIMP or Neo Office disappeared tomorrow I would shed no tears for them.