Though I will disagree with the "Scissor Keyboard 2" point. I think Apple should have genuinely redesigned Butterfly.
This is true, but having to force myself to type lightly is exactly the one thing I dislike about Butterfly. I have no problem doing that for small spans of time, but it can become irritating to sustain it. So I wouldn't mind a collapsing, super-tactile Butterfly.Having played with a butterfly switch up close, I wonder if it's something that would actually be worse in feel with more travel. One of the features of the butterfly switch that I like is the tactility, but with more travel it would likely collapse a lot harder and make it impossible to type lightly.
This is such a great point. A lot of people look at mechanical keyboard users and assume that they hate scissor switches, but most don't. They can feel great when new. The real problem is just how rapidly they degrade and turn to true mush. Butterfly is technically rubber dome, but it somehow doesn't have this issue.I'm mostly with you here though. I actually do like the feel of the butterflies, but I also appreciate the scissor switch 2 ...at least on new models that haven't been broken in yet. Otherwise, I'm generally not a fan of the squishier feel of scissor switches.
it's not so much about making the screen higher DPI but matching the screen's physical resolution back up with the scaled resolution it defaults to - it was changed to 1680x1050 with the 2016 model, but the screen stayed at 2880x1800 so it was no longer integer scaled. This does take some of the sharpness off the screen and to be honest you're paying enough for this machine I don't think its unreasonable to expect a proper @2x scaling 3360x2100, or whatever that translates to with the added resolution on the 16".Magsafe would be awesome for sure. However it's not the end of the world as there's several well functioning adapters on amazon.
At this point though a higher DPI screen is just meaningless. It's already higher resolution than the eye can make out from normal sitting distance and if you're leaning in 8 inches from the screen, you're doing it wrong.
From what I hear though on the phones that have it, 120htz is pretty battery draining isn't it? I mean it would certainly be cool for the next imac but it kinda kills the point of a laptop if the battery is going to need to be plugged in at any point during the day.
This is true, but having to force myself to type lightly is exactly the one thing I dislike about Butterfly. I have no problem doing that for small spans of time, but it can become irritating to sustain it. So I wouldn't mind a collapsing, super-tactile Butterfly.
A lot of people look at mechanical keyboard users and assume that they hate scissor switches, but most don't. They can feel great when new. The real problem is just how rapidly they degrade and turn to true mush. Butterfly is technically rubber dome, but it somehow doesn't have this issue.
It’s color accuracy is improved after calibration, the 16” MacBook Pro lost a good 85 nits itself compared to the 15”, and most importantly, maybe its battery is terrible because of the monster RTX 2080 inside, hmm?Razer has a 17" 4K laptop with 120hz. The display is not very color accurate and doesn't get very bright. The battery also lasts only a few hours.
I would redirect you back to post #2My God, its unbelivable how Apple will never win with some of you. It doesn't matter what they do you still find a reason to complain about something. They've released the best laptop they've ever made, fixing so many things that were wrong with the previous models, and you STILL complain.
Maybe it's time you go to another manufacturer that makes the "perfect" laptop you are looking for and has every single solitary feature known to mankind built into it.
I would redirect you back to post #2- the whole point is they've gone through and corrected a lot of glaring issues and made a great 2016 computer, but it's now 2019 and the standards have moved on again. Ordinarily we would be expecting a fresh design cycle starting in 2020, and undoubtedly they would be looking at things like HDR, resolution, refresh rate for the screen, incorporating FaceID, re-evaluating ports again (should the SD card reader return given the photo-video heavy market for this computer? If we bring back MagSafe, that allows us to increase the power budget over 100W, should we do that?) and some new 'tentpole' feature to be the focus of the machine.
Ultimately they've fixed everything that was putting me off the 2016-2019 15" machines, and finally made a great 4th gen MacBook Pro - but this isn't a substitute for the next proper redesign as it only brings fixes, not new features. This doesn't feel like the 5th gen MacBook Pro, and I mean that's ok, as long as we're not waiting another full 4 year cycle for it. As an interim to take us up to the mini LED HDR model in 2021, it will serve perfectly fine.
and undoubtedly they would be looking at things like HDR, resolution, refresh rate for the screen, incorporating FaceID
Yeah I've read #2, and its still complaining from someone who knows they are complaining but doesn't like to be labeled as one. FaceID, Magsafe, more ports, etc. may all eventually return to their laptop line, but until then these types of threads are just complainers doing their usual thing in here.
Everyone possesses the right to complain and feedback is essentially crucial for developing a better MBP. There is no harm to point out something is wrong with Apple products that can be further improved.
Constructive feedback. What you wrote was just a random rant, without any explanation or reasoning, while accusing people of incompetence.