I understand, but the majority of people don't need this. Not to say it's not needed, and for your needs a better camera is required.
Sure, most are probably happy with shots for Instagram or FB. I'm just thinking that if I can have a 20 mp cam like the one on the 1520 for the same price as the one on the M8 - I'd go for the 1520 any day. (Provided the rest of the camera functionality is up to par of course, speed, reliability, lense etc.)
And 20 mp I think would be quite good enough for my needs. I'm not looking for pro quality or heavy cropping/zooming, or printing, just a more enjoyable experience when showing the pics on a TV or monitor.
We went to Bali at xmas and i made the mistake of only taking a 5S as a camera, photos look ok on phone or macbook not any bigger or blowing up to print, next time will take a real camera.
My daughter took her canon water proof camera we gave her for xmas and it took better photos. On sale for $150.
http://www.officeworks.com.au/shop/...5&cadevice=c&gclid=CKa4-NzJ7b0CFUYUpAodCBkA4w
Well, if we're talking landscape shots then that 12 mp Canon has 4 mp more than the 5S so would simply save a more detailed shot, so that makes sense.
For me personally though I really value being able to carry just the phone, rather than having an additional gadget to mind. So what I'm after is a good enough camera on a phone, that's all. And I think the 20 mp level (+ all the other qualities of the 1520 cam, separate shutter button, OIS, Nokia's photo app etc.) is where that level is hit. I don't require the quality of a proper DSLR. But the M8 just wouldn't do - I wouldn't enjoy it as much as I would a 1520 with its more powerful camera.
Anyway - we all have different needs, and I'm not looking to slam the M8 in general.
🙂 Just saying that having the best possible camera on a phone isn't a totally meaningless thing to want.