We need it because in movies in the future they have it. So we gotta!
I'll be damned if Michael Knight is gonna sport tech from 80's with the same functionality and I'm stuck with no vid phones!
No kiddin'!
We need it because in movies in the future they have it. So we gotta!
I'll be damned if Michael Knight is gonna sport tech from 80's with the same functionality and I'm stuck with no vid phones!
Heh. You never know how long it could take.
Back at the 1964's World Fair, Bell Labs showed video phones and promised us, "any day now". That was 45 years ago and we only actually got it because of Skype and the Internet, not the phone company.
Of course, we were also promised a helicopter in every garage, home lasers for cutting down trees, and mail delivered by personal rocket onto our front yard (ouch!).
i agree. iphone front-facing camera for video conferencing is POINTLESS and USELESS.
I've been on the receiving end of a video call from a phone and really it sucked. The picture was all over the place, try holding your hand out in front of you with a phone, hold it at a constant distance and steady for any length of time. It was like watching a guy on a boat in a rolling sea. The quality sucked to grainy and jumpy.
..the next iphone will likely be subsidized as well.
I remember when camera phones first came out and all I could think was who would want a camera on their cell phone? Who would use that?
Does Apple possibly want to do something like this? Yes.
But will at&t allow them? No. American cell service providers don't have a stable network to allow this. 3G would be down every single day.
Summary: People don't usually use it. You don't use it.
Okay, let me go back a few years...
Text messaging was something that I didn't get into right away, along with many other people (I know some people who are still not convinced about the whole text messaging shindig). And along with many others, I believed that calling was faster and much more logical than texting. Sometimes, I still withhold that to be true and I won't waste my time or the time of the person who I'm trying to contact; in response, I just call. But a few events happened...I bought a RAZR several years ago when they were all the rage and met a girl who texted like crazy...plus, a few of my other friends were catching onto it too. So I tried it out and I haven't looked back since. Text messaging has taken over many people's lives as a form of communication as it has mine. I've even seen 70 year old grandparents (and parents alike) texting their children and it blows my mind.
The point is, it took a while for it to catch on. The cell phone itself was not a one night wonder either. It took several years before people bought into it.
Another point I'd like to add is that major platforms or multiple platforms need to incorporate it in order for it to work. The iPhone is the major platform answer. Therefore, it could be a very feasible idea that could start the beginning of a new era.
I'll tell you one thing....if in 75 years from now, I'm limited to only texting and calling, it'll be one hell of a technological shame.
No way should front facing camera be a priority, however, I think it would make everyone happy if they made it easy to "dock" with your macbook and use its camera for video conference calls. After all, I don't see anyone wanting to make video conference calls in public or while on the run (while driving?) but when they get home it could be useful.
It was. Here is a more thorough article. In fact, I can't believe arn hasn't posted this as news.Oh and btw, did anyone read this? (Quoted in this link)
http://www.9to5mac.com/iphone-viseo-conference
..."the position of the optical sensor can be changed by the user (e.g., by rotating the lens and the sensor in the device housing)"
I believe that was from the patent.