Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Heh. You never know how long it could take.

Back at the 1964's World Fair, Bell Labs showed video phones and promised us, "any day now". That was 45 years ago and we only actually got it because of Skype and the Internet, not the phone company.

Of course, we were also promised a helicopter in every garage, home lasers for cutting down trees, and mail delivered by personal rocket onto our front yard (ouch!).

hover cars? :D

where are those today? huh?

and light-sabers, I mean, c'mon, how hard could it be? :D
 
i agree. iphone front-facing camera for video conferencing is POINTLESS and USELESS.

It may be for you, but with an unlimited data plan, I would make full use of it. I use Skype every day to keep in touch with my relatives overseas, and I have very few connection problems. And that's with an overseas PC with a slower than dial-up internet connection. If it worked close to as well on my iPhone, I would be ecstatic.
 
I've been on the receiving end of a video call from a phone and really it sucked. The picture was all over the place, try holding your hand out in front of you with a phone, hold it at a constant distance and steady for any length of time. It was like watching a guy on a boat in a rolling sea. The quality sucked to grainy and jumpy.

That was my experience in the UK a few years ago too. But I did a mobile video call in Sweden two weeks ago, and it was lovely and smooth (not quite as good as TV but almost there). (Both parties were on mobile phones BTW.)

I saw a friend do a mobile video chat in the UK about 5 months ago. It was better quality than two years ago, but still not as good as Sweden.

(Why? Sweden is the home of Ericsson, which you might know better as Sony Ericsson. Nokia is based next door, in Finland. Both companies make a point of having very high quality 3G services in Scandinavia.)
 
No way should front facing camera be a priority, however, I think it would make everyone happy if they made it easy to "dock" with your macbook and use its camera for video conference calls. After all, I don't see anyone wanting to make video conference calls in public or while on the run (while driving?) but when they get home it could be useful.
 
Does Apple possibly want to do something like this? Yes.

But will at&t allow them? No. American cell service providers don't have a stable network to allow this. 3G would be down every single day.
 
!!!!

dont like it, dont buy it! stick with the old! final statement WE DONT CARE what you dont wanna use on your iphone
 
I remember when camera phones first came out and all I could think was who would want a camera on their cell phone? Who would use that?

Yes, I was about to say that. I think a phone should just be a phone if people keep trying to take down every feature of the phone.
 
Does Apple possibly want to do something like this? Yes.

But will at&t allow them? No. American cell service providers don't have a stable network to allow this. 3G would be down every single day.

How about wifi? AT&T doesn't control that now do they? :)
 
I have a HTC tytn II which has a front facing camera. It's awesome if you can find someone else with a phone that can do that...but at the same time. Not to contradict myself but the novelty of it wears off after a while.
 
Summary: People don't usually use it. You don't use it.








Okay, let me go back a few years...

Text messaging was something that I didn't get into right away, along with many other people (I know some people who are still not convinced about the whole text messaging shindig). And along with many others, I believed that calling was faster and much more logical than texting. Sometimes, I still withhold that to be true and I won't waste my time or the time of the person who I'm trying to contact; in response, I just call. But a few events happened...I bought a RAZR several years ago when they were all the rage and met a girl who texted like crazy...plus, a few of my other friends were catching onto it too. So I tried it out and I haven't looked back since. Text messaging has taken over many people's lives as a form of communication as it has mine. I've even seen 70 year old grandparents (and parents alike) texting their children and it blows my mind.

The point is, it took a while for it to catch on. The cell phone itself was not a one night wonder either. It took several years before people bought into it.

Another point I'd like to add is that major platforms or multiple platforms need to incorporate it in order for it to work. The iPhone is the major platform answer. Therefore, it could be a very feasible idea that could start the beginning of a new era.

I'll tell you one thing....if in 75 years from now, I'm limited to only texting and calling, it'll be one hell of a technological shame.

The thing is we've had video conferencing here for quite a few years. We can even do it for free here and still people don't use it. And maybe it's different for each generation but when I got my first cell phone I started texting right away and so did my friends. Texting, at least here, was very popular as soon as cell phones were common and affordable. Video conferencing is free on certain plans here and still people don't use it.

I'm not against it but there are other features that are a lot higher in my priority list.
 
No way should front facing camera be a priority, however, I think it would make everyone happy if they made it easy to "dock" with your macbook and use its camera for video conference calls. After all, I don't see anyone wanting to make video conference calls in public or while on the run (while driving?) but when they get home it could be useful.

If I'm home I'll just use my laptop. That's why for me video conferencing doesn't interest me. I won't use it in public and at home I'll use my laptop.
 
Oh and btw, did anyone read this? (Quoted in this link)

http://www.9to5mac.com/iphone-viseo-conference

..."the position of the optical sensor can be changed by the user (e.g., by rotating the lens and the sensor in the device housing)"

I believe that was from the patent.
It was. Here is a more thorough article. In fact, I can't believe arn hasn't posted this as news.

It's no doubt now that Apple has put thought into video conferencing on the iPhone. Will they actually implement it though? That's the question.
 
Eh, if they have it...great but it won't be the end of the world if they don't for awhile

I can just see this eating up the battery tremendously
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.