The GeForce 320M compared to the 9600

[warstomp]

i mean 9400m and it runs on medium graphics with 1300x something resolution fine no lag etc you can make it run higher if you want with a littlelag i turned it up to max resolution however it was delayed ( on a 21.5 inch monitor) but otherwise since you have the 9600 it will be perfectly fine unless you want ultra settings

 

[chrstphrtlbt]

just bought the new Macbook Pro 13" and i'm still puzzled by this chip. having just installed Windows on the laptop i went to update the graphics and Nvidia don't have any for the chip on the website?! just wondering what's going on as it's a little confusing

 

[McKs]

just bought the new Macbook Pro 13" and i'm still puzzled by this chip. having just installed Windows on the laptop i went to update the graphics and Nvidia don't have any for the chip on the website?! just wondering what's going on as it's a little confusing

It's custom build for Apple, I think, so no counterpart in the Windows world exists (yet), hence no drivers.

 

[Freyqq]

i have an older mbp with a 8600mgt 128mb vram and it runs sc2 beta on medium at 30-60fps at 1440x900 in bootcamp (vista 32bit). The 320m is suppose to be faster than the 8600mgt, so it should run at least that fast in bootcamp. Also note that you'd be running it at 1280 instead of 1440 resolution, so even better performance.

(note, osx performance is worse than bootcamp's)