What are you talking about? Hating Alistar Darling is one thing, but the winner is the tax payer which is you and me.
Because you win when you pay tax?
What are you talking about? Hating Alistar Darling is one thing, but the winner is the tax payer which is you and me.
What are you talking about? Hating Alistar Darling is one thing, but the winner is the tax payer which is you and me.
I think Pringles' initial intention was to make tennis balls. But on the day that the rubber was supposed to show up, a big truckload of potatoes arrived. But Pringles was a laid-back company. They said "F**k it. Cut 'em up."
I think Pringles' initial intention was to make tennis balls. But on the day that the rubber was supposed to show up, a big truckload of potatoes arrived. But Pringles was a laid-back company. They said "F**k it. Cut 'em up."
I think Pringles' initial intention was to make tennis balls. But on the day that the rubber was supposed to show up, a big truckload of potatoes arrived. But Pringles was a laid-back company. They said "F**k it. Cut 'em up."
I don't know...potato chips are made by slicing a potato and frying or baking the slices until they are crisp. Pringles are not made from potato slices...but instead are made from a processed mixture of various ingredients, some of which is potato. If it's not pure potato, I don't really consider it a "potato chip." I'd be curious how the US Supreme Court would rule on this. They'd probably defer it to a lower court.
there are no real winners here, except:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/media/images/38042000/jpg/_38042095_alistair_darling.jpg
Bastard.
They are potato crisps, not chips.
Chips are thick fries. Fries are thin chips.
I noticed the OP was from Connecticut (somewhere in the USA) posting on an insignificant legal ruling on an insignificant matter from, presumably, an insignificant country. Yet it's worthy of a thread. Does this strike anyone else as humorously ironic?
Hang on, we're talking about crisps here! This is bloody important stuff, 'insignificant' it is not.