We've got a lot of users upset about the thermals on the new 15" MBP. Basically if you buy an i9 or even the upgrades i7 your performance is likely to be throttled down to the the period year's laptop.
Isn't this a physics problem? Before the "Power Users" could get the 17" MBP for the best CPU/GPU combos. Apple was also a lot more able to keep specs higher because there was a ton more cooling in a 17" frame.
The 17" had issues because it didn't sell as well as the smaller MBP because it was too big and heavy but now with reduced bezels and other shrinkage we could make it much smaller and lighter. In the end it'd probably only have to be 1 inch bigger and a little heavier than the current 15".
isn't the problem that all the users who want the powerful creative tool- just have much smaller footprints to deal with now? Would brining back a larger screen option solve this?
Isn't this a physics problem? Before the "Power Users" could get the 17" MBP for the best CPU/GPU combos. Apple was also a lot more able to keep specs higher because there was a ton more cooling in a 17" frame.
The 17" had issues because it didn't sell as well as the smaller MBP because it was too big and heavy but now with reduced bezels and other shrinkage we could make it much smaller and lighter. In the end it'd probably only have to be 1 inch bigger and a little heavier than the current 15".
isn't the problem that all the users who want the powerful creative tool- just have much smaller footprints to deal with now? Would brining back a larger screen option solve this?