OK, your swear word filter wins.![]()
That's funny. I got the same message a few times from MR. I think you found the solution.
OK, your swear word filter wins.![]()
I hope they don't go down this path, but I fear they are going to vacate the mid-range headless market.And to further the discussion farther I don't think Apple will do anything about the Mac Mini but make it weaker and more expensive. Just saying.
When we had rumors of a new design pro, I totally thought they were going to do a stackable mini pro.
Maybe they can still pull it off.
Trust me, the silence on this discussion topic late must mean something. It's quiet. Too quiet. The new Mac mini pro is almost certainly coming.
Wrong.....all you need is an iPad Protaken from the gospel of Tim
![]()
Wrong.....all you need is an iPad Protaken from the gospel of Tim
![]()
I thought that only applied to Windows users![]()
Wrong.....all you need is an iPad Protaken from the gospel of Tim
![]()
The Mac mini was never intended to be a Pro machine.
Seems like every iteration of the Mac mini gets rid of something people care about. The 2012 lacked a dGPU, the 2014 lacked quad-cores and removable RAM, so what will the 2016 lack? Where could Apple go wrong this time?
Minor bump up to a "good enough" Broadwell processor.Seems like every iteration of the Mac mini gets rid of something people care about. The 2012 lacked a dGPU, the 2014 lacked quad-cores and removable RAM, so what will the 2016 lack? Where could Apple go wrong this time?
Seems like every iteration of the Mac mini gets rid of something people care about. The 2012 lacked a dGPU, the 2014 lacked quad-cores and removable RAM, so what will the 2016 lack? Where could Apple go wrong this time?
That might be just it. The Mac mini has historically used chips from the MacBook Air. No skylake for Air, thus none for Mac mini either. Not to mention they would have to use Iris Pro graphics if they chose skylake, and we all know that Apple treats those graphics as "high-end".Minor bump up to a "good enough" Broadwell processor.
That might be just it. The Mac mini has historically used chips from the MacBook Air. No skylake for Air, thus none for Mac mini either. Not to mention they would have to use Iris Pro graphics if they chose skylake, and we all know that Apple treats those graphics as "high-end".
How would you guys react if this happened?
replace all ports with a single usb-c!![]()
Isn't Broadwell just a shrink of Haswell? Meaning that Broadwell will also have the different CPU sockets for the i7s, so that Apple would have to build an additional motherboard to be able to offer a quad processor for the Mini? Yes?
For some reason I find it difficult to think of the words "mini" and "pro" used together in a device name.
Agreed, but the Quad i7 Mini gave people a taste of that possibility.
For many years there has been much demand and complaining that there's no standalone computer between the Mac Mini and the Mac Pro. It's been so long that I don't see Apple doing it, especially with their post-PC-era attitude...but man, the demand would be huge.