The argument that's being made is do we want serviceable/upgradeable devices but it's an extra quarter of an inch thicker or do we want to sacrifice function over form? Do we want thinness over the ability to service/upgrade the device?
I rather Apple chop out what isn't needed. That frees up extra space which they can use to either increase the batteries, function, or decrease the size and weight of the laptop, making it more portable. After all, this isn't a desktop, so arguably the most important function, other than performance, is portability. I don't see upgradability as a function at all. If you need a new laptop a few years down the road, sell your current one and upgrade to a new model.
Apple's products are in such high demand their value hardly depreciates at all. I never have a problem selling my older Apple hardware for very respectable prices. Rather than waste money upgrading individual components, I rather use that money to upgrade the entire machine to a newer model that will help me achieve my work demands even better than the previous model. Yes this might be slightly more expensive than upgrading individual parts, but considering these are premium products intended for "professional" purposes, you'd think these small costs would be easily absorbable.
----------
ipso facto, you are correcto![]()
Except for the spelling error (now fixed).