Become a MacRumors Supporter for $25/year with no ads, private forums, and more!
  • Did you order new AirTags? We've opened a dedicated AirTags forum.

MacRumors

macrumors bot
Original poster
Apr 12, 2001
52,441
14,142



111551-nytimes_ipad_mbp_iphone.jpg

The New York Times today announced that it is launching a package of digital subscriptions for access to its content, specifically revealing that it has agreed to Apple's in app subscription program that allows customers to subscribe via their iTunes Store account with Apple taking a 30% cut of revenue. The new subscription options launch on March 28th, with the one-click iTunes Store options for subscribing within iPhone and iPad apps coming available by June 30th.The subscription plan allows for free access to a set amount of content across digital platforms. When the monthly reading limit is reached, users who are not already home delivery subscribers will be asked to become digital subscribers.

Digital subscriptions will be available in the United States and globally on March 28, 2011. The Times is launching digital subscriptions in the Canadian market beginning today in order to fine-tune the customer experience prior to the global launch.

For non-home delivery subscribers, the basic package - NYTimes.com plus Smartphone App - will start at $15 every four weeks.Standard digital pricing is set at $15 per four-week period for full access to NYTimes.com and access through a smartphone app such as on the iPhone. Those seeking to pair NYTimes.com access with iPad app access will be charged $20 per four-week period, while those wishing to have complete access across NYTimes.com, iPhone and iPad will be charged $35 per four-week period. Introductory pricing specials will be available at the service's launch.

The New York Times will also offer individuals free access to up to 20 articles per month, and users directed to articles from search results, blog links, and social media will be able to access those articles in their entirety free of charge even if they've reached their monthly limit for free content. The "Top News" section of smartphone and tablet apps will remain free of charge at all times, and subscribers to the print edition of The New York Times will have free access to all digital content.

Article Link: 'The New York Times' Announces Digital Access With In App Subscriptions
 

goobot

macrumors 603
Jun 26, 2009
5,986
3,074
long island NY
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_2_1 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/533.17.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0.2 Mobile/8C148 Safari/6533.18.5)

I wonder If emploies get this for free. I ask cause my dad works for the nyt and he gets the paper for free.
 
Comment

vincenz

macrumors 601
Oct 20, 2008
4,271
155
Unbelievable. Charging this much for information in this day and age? I'll have to find other sources of news.

Good luck, NYTimes. Hope you enjoy seeing your readership plummet.
 
Comment

HappyPig

macrumors newbie
Oct 24, 2006
7
1
No discount for using the app on both an iPhone and an iPad. Wow, that sucks. That discount on the 28th had better be good, as I'm not going to pay $450 a year as proposed with their current model. Maybe I can get an extended group of people interested in splitting the cost for one account.
 
Comment

GoCubsGo

macrumors Nehalem
Feb 19, 2005
35,741
148
Whomever decided on the price point should be fired. No one willingly should have to pay more for digital content. I can get all my news elsewhere for free or much less than what they're charging. I really don't see how I'd be missing out if I skip the NYT going forward.
 
Comment

chelsel

macrumors 6502
May 24, 2007
442
202
Unbelievable. Charging this much for information in this day and age? I'll have to find other sources of news.

Good luck, NYTimes. Hope you enjoy seeing your readership plummet.

It's not like their website isn't still up and running and they've had a paywall for years. They probably believe they will reach a greater market than they currently do and that will make up for any revenue hit, and they are probably right.
 
Comment

peteo

macrumors regular
Sep 23, 2007
224
134
Wow that is allot of Money. I'll guess ill see if i can get by on the free version.

Maybe they will run promos all the time like they do for the paper.
I cant see paying more than $10-15 a month though.
 
Comment

jb1280

macrumors 6502a
Jan 13, 2009
859
215
$20 per month for all apps and website content plus the ability to read the news offline would have been reasonable.

$35 per month for glorified web content is unreasonable.
 
Comment

nastebu

macrumors 6502
May 5, 2008
354
0
$455 per year? Wouldn't it be cheaper to just subscribe to the newsprint version?

The first 12 weeks of a full print subscription with home delivery are 50% off and cost $70.20. The rest of the year is $11.70 for each week.

So:

12 weeks = $70.20
40 weeks = $468.00
total = $538.20

So no, it's not cheaper. And the next year is at full price so the cost is $608.40.
 
Last edited:
Comment

Detlev

macrumors 6502a
Sep 16, 2003
509
0
I'm just not seeing the benefit. :confused: I can get quality news elsewhere, faster and cheaper. It also seems I would be paying extra just for redundant technologies. I assume there is a benefit if I actually wanted to read about local NYC news. If there is something big it is being covered by others or put out through AP. Yes NYT is the most awarded (Pulitzer Prize) but quite honestly not recently for anything already being covered by the web or special interest groups. So, what is the benefit?
 
Comment

Eye4Desyn

macrumors 6502
Jan 22, 2009
263
0
U, S, and A
No thanks, I'll pass

For some there will be value here if they are religious NYT readers, but $180/yr for information that is free?? To each his/her own. I'll skip this one.
 
Comment

Ieo

macrumors 6502
Jun 17, 2009
251
0
Support it through ads....No way in hell am I paying for a subscription at that rate. There are too many free sources of news out there for me to pay $260 a year (iPad + online only rate) for NYT.
 
Comment

sososowhat

macrumors 6502
Feb 20, 2003
287
42
Palo Alto, CA
This is a big deal: it applies to their regular website as well! Print alone is dying, so if they're to survive they need to charge for digital. Online ads might support some types of organizations, but not a global news organization. If it's a choice between NYTimes dying or paying for content: I'll pay for content. That said, the pricing seems absurdly high. They seem to be trying to force people to buy the hard-copy, but that seems to me to be old-school thinking.

Here's a link to the Editor's letter: http://www.nytimes.com/2011/03/18/opinion/l18times.html
 
Last edited:
Comment
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.